$PREDICT token distribution shows interesting patterns across major market players. According to on-chain analysis, 3.7% of tokens remain locked for the next 179 days, providing some stability to the circulating supply. The token distribution reveals significant concentration among institutional holders. Two major clusters hold 6.7% and 6.1% respectively on bubble mapping data. Most notably, centralized exchange reserves account for 58.7% of total holdings, highlighting substantial liquidity concentration on major platforms. When examining individual CEX allocations, the data becomes more granular: leading exchange wallets control 15%, another major platform holds 25.4%, while a third exchange maintains 3.6% of token reserves. This distribution underscores the importance of CEX liquidity in $PREDICT's market dynamics and suggests traders should monitor these wallet movements closely for potential supply-side shifts.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MetaNeighbor
· 13h ago
NGL, the CEX concentration here is a bit scary, with 58.7% held by exchanges. A single dump could wipe it out directly.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingersFOMO
· 22h ago
CEX is so concentrated, it's a bit scary—58.7%. It feels like a dump could happen at any time.
View OriginalReply0
NoStopLossNut
· 22h ago
With CEX so centralized, a single big whale's dump can cause a market crash. How cautious should this coin be?
View OriginalReply0
MoonRocketTeam
· 22h ago
Wow, 58.7% stacked on exchanges? How careful do you have to be with a beer belly dumping the market?
---
With such centralized CEXs, one big bearish candle can send someone to the hospital.
---
Lock-up for 179 days only 3.7%, where's the promised stability? Seems a bit虚 (虚 means "虚" in Chinese, but in context, it likely means "虚" as in "虚假" or "虚伪" meaning "fake" or "虚" as in "虚假稳定" meaning "fake stability"). So, "a bit fake" or "not very stable."
---
Two big holders with 6.7% and 6.1%, feels like they're playing a seesaw.
---
Good grief, 25.4% held by a certain exchange, how long does this need to be monitored?
---
On the supply side, watching wallet flows is more important than looking at K-line charts.
---
15%, 25.4%, 3.6%, with such poor distribution, can it really go to the moon?
---
Bro, once this distribution chart came out, I started breaking out in cold sweat.
---
Institutional consolidation, retail investors taking the hit, old story, isn't it?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-75ee51e7
· 23h ago
58.7% is held on exchanges. How worried should we be about a dump happening soon?
$PREDICT token distribution shows interesting patterns across major market players. According to on-chain analysis, 3.7% of tokens remain locked for the next 179 days, providing some stability to the circulating supply. The token distribution reveals significant concentration among institutional holders. Two major clusters hold 6.7% and 6.1% respectively on bubble mapping data. Most notably, centralized exchange reserves account for 58.7% of total holdings, highlighting substantial liquidity concentration on major platforms. When examining individual CEX allocations, the data becomes more granular: leading exchange wallets control 15%, another major platform holds 25.4%, while a third exchange maintains 3.6% of token reserves. This distribution underscores the importance of CEX liquidity in $PREDICT's market dynamics and suggests traders should monitor these wallet movements closely for potential supply-side shifts.