2026-01-18 12:29:30

The core competitiveness of the Web3 ecosystem lies in the participation of genuine users, rather than false bounty incentives. The key is to support those builders who truly deliver products during open testing, allowing bad coins to gradually be eliminated.

Binding proxy tags to actual actions is a missing link in the Web3 collaborative ecosystem. When contributors are prioritized and treated differently, the noise will naturally diminish, and effective collaboration can emerge.

On mobile devices, identity verification should be the first line of defense—no need for lists, forms, or complicated processes. Transforming complex security mechanisms into seamless experiences is the true strength of the product.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SpeakWithHatOn

· 9h ago

That's right, bounty hunters are everywhere now, but truly capable builders are a rare find. We really have to set this threshold, or else garbage projects will keep cutting the leeks. Projects that prioritize this aspect are indeed much more refreshing, with minimal noise. The idea of seamless identity verification is brilliant; the complicated process should have been eliminated long ago. The problem is that most projects are still using the dumbest methods to attract users, and they don't realize this at all. Clearing out bad coins is easy to say, but who is really willing to take action?

View OriginalReply0

TopEscapeArtist

· 01-18 12:55

Exactly right, the bounty incentives should have been cut long ago, it's just a bunch of arbitrageurs repeatedly exploiting... True builders don't care about those tricks at all. Just look at the technical indicators, the signal of this wave of bad coins being cleared out has already appeared in the MACD golden cross.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketBuyer

· 01-18 12:41

Well said. The bounty incentive system should have gone bankrupt long ago. I've seen too many freeloaders who disappear after collecting the money, while those who actually do the work are drowned out by the noise. This binding system needs to be phased out, or else bad money will drive out good money too harshly. The mobile verification process definitely needs optimization; the cumbersome procedures really discourage a lot of people.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsShaman

· 01-18 12:40

Exactly, but there are too many projects wasting rewards every day while their products are terrible. It's time for a cleanup. Genuine builders have long been drowned out by these duds. Now someone finally dares to expose this issue. I agree on the identity verification part. The complicated process is just driving people away. If UX isn't done well, how can we talk about Web3 adoption?

View OriginalReply0

GhostAddressMiner

· 01-18 12:33

It sounds good, but I took a look at the addresses of those "truly delivered" builders, and the fund flow still follows the same old tricks... Bounty incentives are indeed garbage, but on-chain data tells me a different story.

View OriginalReply0