A legendary portfolio strategist just dropped an eye-opening result: his long-short approach managed to double S&P 500 gains over just eight months. Here's the kicker—he did it by exploiting the gap between a specialized US equity ETF and the broad market index. It's a direct challenge to the conventional wisdom around passive index investing. The strategy reveals something important: there's real opportunity when you dig beyond what everyone else is holding. Whether this works going forward is another story, but it shows why some pros aren't content sitting with standard index returns. The divergence between different index methodologies might be bigger than most assume.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Rugpull幸存者
· 13h ago
Doubled in eight months? Ha, let's first look at the backtest data.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivor
· 13h ago
Another story of "backtesting being unbeatable, but live trading dying"... Doubling in 8 months? I don't believe a word of it.
View OriginalReply0
fren.eth
· 13h ago
Bro, I've seen through this trick a long time ago. It's just spread arbitrage. Can you reproduce it?
View OriginalReply0
BitcoinDaddy
· 13h ago
I've seen this trick before; the backtest data is always the most impressive set.
A legendary portfolio strategist just dropped an eye-opening result: his long-short approach managed to double S&P 500 gains over just eight months. Here's the kicker—he did it by exploiting the gap between a specialized US equity ETF and the broad market index. It's a direct challenge to the conventional wisdom around passive index investing. The strategy reveals something important: there's real opportunity when you dig beyond what everyone else is holding. Whether this works going forward is another story, but it shows why some pros aren't content sitting with standard index returns. The divergence between different index methodologies might be bigger than most assume.