Recently, market hotspots have been rotating quickly, but the number of good projects that people truly focus on and study deeply is actually decreasing. I recently took another careful look at Dusk. To be honest, it’s not the kind of project that immediately impresses you, but the more you look into it, the clearer it becomes what they are doing.
The core idea of Dusk is not complicated, but very interesting — privacy is not used to evade regulation, but to serve real financial activities. This is completely opposite to how most privacy chains operate.
Traditional privacy solutions emphasize "no one can see," but in the real financial world, it’s quite the opposite. Accounts need to be auditable, assets need to be verifiable, but sensitive information like transaction details and participant relationships do not need to be publicly disclosed. Dusk is working in this middle ground. They have integrated zero-knowledge proofs directly into the protocol layer, targeting the privacy needs of real financial scenarios, rather than creating anonymous tools.
This also explains why Dusk has been emphasizing its positioning — as a Layer1 for institutional finance, securitized assets, and RWA scenarios. Many projects are now riding the RWA trend, but when it comes to actual implementation, you’ll find that the biggest headache isn’t where to find assets.
The real bottlenecks are three issues: How to protect privacy? How to audit on-chain data? How do regulators accept it? Dusk’s design approach doesn’t seem to chase the trend, but rather looks like an early ambush, waiting for market demand to truly explode. It doesn’t rely on emotional cycles, but it’s very promising when the main trend shifts.
When the market starts pricing the "compliance + real assets" combination, Dusk, as a foundational infrastructure, will be hard to undervalue in the long term.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
0xLuckbox
· 9h ago
To be honest, most privacy chains I’ve looked at make me want to fall asleep, but this approach does have some substance. No one has really thought of the gameplay in the middle ground.
View OriginalReply0
UnluckyLemur
· 9h ago
It took me a while to understand what Dusk is doing, and it really has some substance.
Most privacy chains are just trying to hide, but Dusk actually wants to be audited... The logical contrast is interesting.
Among so many RWA projects, only a few can truly solve regulatory issues.
View OriginalReply0
LonelyAnchorman
· 10h ago
Wow, finally someone has explained Dusk thoroughly. I've been pondering this logic for the past two months.
Really, there are very few people who understand this layer in privacy chains. Most projects just shout "anonymous freedom," but they don't realize that the financial world simply doesn't buy into that.
The more I look at Dusk's approach, the more interesting I find it. It's not fleeing regulation; rather, it's actively embracing it. This contrast reminds me of what an old veteran said recently: "The projects that truly make money are often those that don't look sexy."
The compliance + RWA mainline will eventually be priced in. When that happens, I guess another wave of people will regret not getting on board earlier.
The market is still hyping concepts, but the value logic of infrastructure projects like Dusk truly doesn't rely on short-term sentiment.
View OriginalReply0
fren.eth
· 10h ago
To be honest, Dusk's approach is indeed unconventional, but there's something there...
It's really hard not to follow the trend, but projects that chase quick profits don't last long. This idea of privacy + compliance feels like a gamble on the future of regulation.
There are a bunch of RWA concepts, but few have truly understood these three questions. Once the market reacts, those who have laid out early will indeed benefit...
Compliance and privacy sound a bit contradictory, but thinking about what institutions truly need, it seems to make sense.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterBearish
· 10h ago
Oh no, someone finally said it—most privacy chains are really just messing around.
That's right, compliance is the real gold in the future, and those hide-and-seek projects will eventually suffer.
Dusk has really figured out zero-knowledge proofs, but it's still too niche right now.
When the RWA track truly takes off, only projects supported by underlying protocols will survive.
But on the other hand, will institutions really buy into it? That's still a question mark.
Recently, market hotspots have been rotating quickly, but the number of good projects that people truly focus on and study deeply is actually decreasing. I recently took another careful look at Dusk. To be honest, it’s not the kind of project that immediately impresses you, but the more you look into it, the clearer it becomes what they are doing.
The core idea of Dusk is not complicated, but very interesting — privacy is not used to evade regulation, but to serve real financial activities. This is completely opposite to how most privacy chains operate.
Traditional privacy solutions emphasize "no one can see," but in the real financial world, it’s quite the opposite. Accounts need to be auditable, assets need to be verifiable, but sensitive information like transaction details and participant relationships do not need to be publicly disclosed. Dusk is working in this middle ground. They have integrated zero-knowledge proofs directly into the protocol layer, targeting the privacy needs of real financial scenarios, rather than creating anonymous tools.
This also explains why Dusk has been emphasizing its positioning — as a Layer1 for institutional finance, securitized assets, and RWA scenarios. Many projects are now riding the RWA trend, but when it comes to actual implementation, you’ll find that the biggest headache isn’t where to find assets.
The real bottlenecks are three issues: How to protect privacy? How to audit on-chain data? How do regulators accept it? Dusk’s design approach doesn’t seem to chase the trend, but rather looks like an early ambush, waiting for market demand to truly explode. It doesn’t rely on emotional cycles, but it’s very promising when the main trend shifts.
When the market starts pricing the "compliance + real assets" combination, Dusk, as a foundational infrastructure, will be hard to undervalue in the long term.