XRP's start in 2026 saw an increase of over 20%, a remarkable achievement, but behind this surge lies an awkward problem: the original core mission of this coin—serving as a transitional asset for banks—seems to be failing.
Analysts point out the key issue: banks and institutions have already changed their stance. They are not optimistic about XRP, but are instead turning to stablecoins like USDC or directly using Ripple's own non-XRP settlement tools. This means that no matter how fast or bullish Ripple's development is, it may not necessarily boost the demand for XRP itself.
The situation is even more brutal. The stablecoin market has already surpassed $300 billion in size, and although Ripple has established hundreds of partnerships, the cross-border payment business is gradually being eroded by alternatives like USDC. The original problem XRP aimed to solve is being overtaken by more standardized solutions. The growth has been good, but how optimistic can the outlook be? This is a question worth reflecting on.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GamefiEscapeArtist
· 13h ago
Uh... just happy with a 20% increase? There's a hollow behind it, brother. Even banks are moving to USDC, XRP's mission should have been phased out long ago.
View OriginalReply0
memecoin_therapy
· 14h ago
The rise has risen, but the true nature of meme coins has been fully exposed. Banks simply don't buy into it and have shifted to stablecoins, leaving XRP as the abandoned child.
View OriginalReply0
fork_in_the_road
· 14h ago
It's gone up, but honestly, this is just hype. If banks don't want XRP anymore, how else can it be played...
XRP's start in 2026 saw an increase of over 20%, a remarkable achievement, but behind this surge lies an awkward problem: the original core mission of this coin—serving as a transitional asset for banks—seems to be failing.
Analysts point out the key issue: banks and institutions have already changed their stance. They are not optimistic about XRP, but are instead turning to stablecoins like USDC or directly using Ripple's own non-XRP settlement tools. This means that no matter how fast or bullish Ripple's development is, it may not necessarily boost the demand for XRP itself.
The situation is even more brutal. The stablecoin market has already surpassed $300 billion in size, and although Ripple has established hundreds of partnerships, the cross-border payment business is gradually being eroded by alternatives like USDC. The original problem XRP aimed to solve is being overtaken by more standardized solutions. The growth has been good, but how optimistic can the outlook be? This is a question worth reflecting on.