2026-01-18 13:32:50

The boom and bust of the crypto market can sometimes change overnight. My investment records are already filled with a "battle damage list," each one a bloody lesson.

Let's start with RC, once a star among anonymous coins. Now its 24-hour trading volume is less than $2, and mainstream exchanges can't even find trading pairs for it. It has completely become a zombie asset. SERO's situation isn't much better—although it hasn't gone to zero directly, the technical team has long been silent, and the price has fallen 99% from its high. The coins in hand are like worthless paper.

NT and Biki's platform tokens are even worse—the platform has disappeared entirely. Those who stayed up late mining and promoting for sharing are finally met with a "Cannot Access" prompt. Trading records have become digital tombstones, forever unfulfilled.

The story of Yangliu Coin is the most ironic. It was initially attracted by the narrative of "family pocket money + children's financial literacy," but never saw through the pseudo-demand nature of the project. The official website stopped updates, the team went silent, and the massive inflation of 10 billion coins directly hit the floor. Now, the trading volume is close to zero. Coins like Thor, Color, and ChainX, have no chance to struggle—they just disappeared without a trace.

I also followed the trend and bought FLOKI and BabyDoge, only to lose nearly 10 times. Watching the account balance shrink, I finally understood—meme coins' carnival is just a scene. Assets without real value support only have one ending: complete zeroing out.

The only survivor is Grass. Selling in time, it became the only survivor in this wave of zeroing out.

These failed investments have taught me not how to make quick money, but how to survive longer.

SERO-3,87%

FLOKI-9,38%

BABYDOGE-5,92%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BlockchainBrokenPromise

· 20h ago

I should have gone all-in on Grass from the start; everything else is really just paying tuition fees.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseVagabond

· 21h ago

Damn, looking at this list makes my scalp tingle; it's basically my blood, sweat, and tears history.

View OriginalReply0

LightningWallet

· 21h ago

Wow, this checklist gave me chills. I almost fell for Yangliu Coin's childish financial literacy spiel too. Luckily, I didn't make a move.

View OriginalReply0

HypotheticalLiquidator

· 21h ago

The speed at which health factors collapse is often faster than your reaction time. After reading this damage report, the domino effect is clear at a glance. Chain liquidations happen like this — when a project team runs away, the lending rates across the entire chain instantly spiral out of control, and the subsequent coins directly hit the liquidation price. When RC trading volume drops below $2, it's no longer a price issue; it's a signal of systemic risk. The story of FLOKI losing 10 times is, frankly, the backlash of leverage. Assets without fundamental support, with volatility off the charts, and a poorly set stop-loss — this is the result. Surviving Grass is the key — knowing when to deleverage is much more valuable than knowing when to leverage up. Meme coins are essentially a game of hot potato; sooner or later, it will hit the last person holding it.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoGoldmine

· 21h ago

This wave of zeroing out is actually the best filtering mechanism; those who remain have real output. Historical records speak the loudest. The combination of RC to FLOKI directly turned me into a cold-blooded analyst. Assets without fundamental support, no matter how high the computing power, are useless. The yield on the Grass wave isn't particularly impressive, but its stability data clearly outperforms other meme projects. This is what investors should focus on. The cost of following the trend is better calculated as the cost of improving computing efficiency, which is more insightful. The most painful part of account zeroing out is that you can't find the technical reasons behind the transaction chain. When the platform disappears, it means data auditing is completely broken. Looking at this logic, zeroing out is just superficial. The real issue is that the project's technical iteration cycle hasn't kept up with market adjustments. Instead of regret, it's better to see how Grass managed to survive the difficulty adjustment period—this is the ROI metric worth studying.

View OriginalReply0