2026-01-18 13:33:23

Recently, I have been paying attention to new project IPO opportunities, and the data comparison is quite interesting. SENT has a total circulating supply of 34.3 billion, with a 2% allocation for IPOs, corresponding to 680 million. A while ago, the FOGO project had a total of 10 billion, with the same 2% IPO allocation, and it has now long fallen below the initial purchase price. This phenomenon is worth pondering—given the market cap is there, if you want to participate in IPOs, rather than holding onto a lucky mindset, it's better to carefully assess the risks.

After a deeper understanding of these projects' backgrounds, I found several interesting characteristics. The funding involved reportedly reaches the 80 million level, and the project team mainly comes from the same region. Interestingly, such projects are often given a trillion-level imagination space when listed on the Alpha platform, but based on historical performance, only a few can really generate strong market trends.

Tomorrow, the IPO pricing will be revealed. If following the usual approach, hedging and risk offsetting might be a good strategy. But the key still depends on whether the market recognizes it. Overall, this round of new project IPO opportunities indeed requires cautious consideration.

FOGO0,1%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ContractFreelancer

· 12h ago

Another routine, hundreds of billions of imagined space ending in a complete mess --- The lessons from FOGO are still fresh in my mind, and now they want to repeat it? --- Raising 80 million with a market cap of a trillion, haha --- I won't say I see through it, but can hedging really save the situation? --- Teams from the same region always seem a bit off --- Tomorrow's pricing will be the real test, hope it’s not another scene of cutting leeks --- A 2% allocation for IPOs sounds the same, so why do some keep falling into traps? --- Instead of pondering, just pass directly --- I've been immune to the hype of the Alpha platform for a long time --- Whether the market recognizes it or not, retail investors have already been acknowledged

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityOracle

· 01-18 14:03

This lesson from FOGO is right here. Why are some people still rushing into the muddy waters... A trillion-dollar imagination space is just to listen to, really just a classic money-grabbing scheme. It's the same regional team, and they raised 80 million while claiming to be worth a trillion. I could play out this script with my eyes closed. Instead of focusing on the tiny profits from new listings, it's better to think about when you can break even... The market is very unlikely to recognize it.

View OriginalReply0

ForkThisDAO

· 01-18 14:00

It's the same old trick again, a trillion-dollar imagination space, but it ends up crashing to pieces. I also got burned on the FOGO wave, really no difference. The 2% allocation for new listings seems attractive, but the story that follows is always the same.

View OriginalReply0

SundayDegen

· 01-18 13:57

It's the same old trick of a trillion-dollar imaginary space. History has already taught us a lesson, yet some still rush in. The lesson from FOGO is still fresh, and now there's another round... Hedging sounds impressive, but the market simply doesn't buy it. IPO is a game of probability; instead of gambling on luck, it's better to understand clearly before taking action. There's definitely something fishy about the 80 million financing; I've seen many teams from the same region working together. Honestly, based on this data pattern, it's highly likely to break the offering price.

View OriginalReply0

gas_fee_trauma

· 01-18 13:54

It's the same old story of hundreds of billions in imagined potential. Wake up, everyone. Have you not learned enough from the lessons of FOGO? Before participating in new listings, ask yourself: is this genuine research or just gambling? Hedging and risk management? Instead of thinking about these, it's better to first understand the true background of the project team. A team from the same region—that says a lot. Tomorrow's pricing is probably going to cut another wave of retail investors. Instead of following the trend, better to observe and see who will fall into the trap this time.

View OriginalReply0

BrokenRugs

· 01-18 13:38

IPO investing is a gamble on human nature. The lesson from FOGO hasn't been fully learned yet, and it's about to repeat itself. --- A hundred billion in imagined space has made ears calloused. Frankly, it's still a game of being a bagholder. --- Raising 80 million from the same hometown team. I've seen this combo too many times; the tricks can be deadly. --- When the market doesn't recognize the value, hedging can't save you. It's better to stay on the sidelines for now. --- SENT's 2% share seems modest, but we'll see what happens in the end. --- Lucky psychology is the biggest killer of IPO investing. How many people can truly resist it? --- The marketing tactics of the Alpha platform—it's time for everyone to wake up.

View OriginalReply0