JST's destruction strategy is interesting. One-time destruction easily becomes a marketing gimmick; the real moat lies in whether a sustainable and implementable deflation mechanism can be built. JST has completed a key leap in these two rounds of destruction — from theoretical validation to mechanism implementation. This step is very critical. Whether the Real Yield logic can be successfully and practically implemented mainly depends on the timing. A deterministic deflation expectation often can create a premium, while those vague promises are more prone to failure. From this perspective, JST combines model validation with actual implementation, and this approach is indeed more worth paying attention to. A continuous deflation mechanism and predictable yield release — this is the long-term competitiveness of the project.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NftDeepBreather
· 16h ago
Finally, a project that honestly implements deflation, not just hype.
Continuous burning > a wave of marketing, this logic makes sense.
Can JST replicate this approach? The key is how long they can坚持坚持。
Basically, it's about whose promises are more reliable; certainty is king.
This is what real yield looks like, unlike some projects that just keep making empty promises.
The implementation of the mechanism has indeed stalled many projects; JST is taking it seriously.
How long can the deflationary expectation be sustained? That’s the real test.
View OriginalReply0
RektDetective
· 16h ago
This ongoing deflation model can truly be implemented, and it's much more reliable than those one-time burn show operations.
View OriginalReply0
0xDreamChaser
· 16h ago
Damn, finally seeing a project that dares to pursue continuous deflation instead of just hype marketing. JST's approach is truly different.
Only after two rounds of destruction and successful implementation is it real substance. Projects that only talk without action should have already failed.
Whether the deflation mechanism can be maintained depends on the subsequent pace; don’t let it become a fleeting phenomenon again.
Real Yield needs to be truly implemented; that’s the long-term moat, not those vague promises.
A certain and reliable expectation can indeed support the price. I've been burned too many times by empty slogans.
A workable mechanism > attractive promises. I respect JST’s approach.
But it still depends on how they execute next; no matter how good the words, results speak louder.
View OriginalReply0
GasBankrupter
· 16h ago
Hold on, the real test has just begun. It's easy to call it a deflationary mechanism, but whether it can actually be sustained is the true key.
JST's destruction strategy is interesting. One-time destruction easily becomes a marketing gimmick; the real moat lies in whether a sustainable and implementable deflation mechanism can be built. JST has completed a key leap in these two rounds of destruction — from theoretical validation to mechanism implementation. This step is very critical. Whether the Real Yield logic can be successfully and practically implemented mainly depends on the timing. A deterministic deflation expectation often can create a premium, while those vague promises are more prone to failure. From this perspective, JST combines model validation with actual implementation, and this approach is indeed more worth paying attention to. A continuous deflation mechanism and predictable yield release — this is the long-term competitiveness of the project.