Over the years in the blockchain space, my taste in Layer 1 public chains has become more and more selective. To be honest, with "one-click chain deployment" everywhere now, simply competing on TPS no longer has much appeal. What truly moves me are those that solve real problems with irreplaceable technical designs. That’s also why I’ve developed a strong interest in the Dusk chain.
To put it simply, Dusk is not just a blockchain; it’s more like an operating system tailored for financial privacy. Going through its technical documentation, the integration of Piecrust virtual machine and zero-knowledge proofs indeed has a unique approach. Most projects in Web3 treat privacy as a marketing gimmick or a patch added after the fact. But Dusk is different — privacy is built into the core from the ground up, inherently included.
What does this mean? Smart contracts can directly perform logic operations on encrypted data. In other words, we can run complex business matching, blind auctions, or even payroll distribution on-chain, with minimal data risk. Just imagining this space gets me a little excited.
Holding $DUSK feels like conducting a "technological faith" experiment for me. When the market isn’t doing well, seeing the development team still pushing code on GitHub and the testnet gradually refining — that sense of participation is far beyond what buying meme coins can offer. I understand clearly that real technological implementation takes time, and from code to ecosystem explosion is a long process. But just look at those core technical indicators, the potential of $DUSK has always been there.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MetaMisfit
· 2h ago
Is the underlying privacy design really a feasible approach?
---
Once again, the savior theory of zero-knowledge proofs. I've seen too many stories like this.
---
Dusk's biggest problem is actually its ecosystem. No matter how advanced the technology is, without a usable app, it's useless.
---
$DUSK has been around for so long, but it's just a gamble on the development team's integrity.
---
Privacy contracts sound impressive, but how do they pass financial regulation? This part hasn't been thought through.
---
Bro, your "technological faith" makes me a bit uneasy. Can it hold up when the coin price drops?
---
Piecrust is indeed interesting, but how does it compare to Aztec? Are these two really that far apart?
---
Honestly, I believe in the direction of embedding privacy at the core layer, but I'm worried it might just turn into another "next Ethereum" story.
---
The real question is, which Dapp is actually using this set? Or is it mostly supported by imagination?
---
I don't deny the hardcore technology, but in the end, the market often boils down to marketing and hype. Dusk is a bit cold in this regard.
View OriginalReply0
MrRightClick
· 15h ago
The underlying privacy architecture is indeed impressive; it can't be matched by after-the-fact patches.
View OriginalReply0
Frontrunner
· 15h ago
The underlying privacy architecture indeed has imagination, but implementation is the key.
Finally, someone understands. The TPS arms race is really boring.
Piecrust is easy to talk about, but actually using it still needs time.
$DUSK technology faith, I'm also betting on this.
The worst thing is another "paper tiger chain." Let's wait and see.
Blindly shooting zero data leaks? Sounds good, but I'm afraid it's just talk on paper.
Fast development progress is a good thing, but when will the product truly go live?
Doing privacy well from the bottom up is indeed rare; most are just patches afterward, no doubt.
I really respect this idea—treat privacy as an operating system rather than a module. There's something there.
View OriginalReply0
JustHodlIt
· 15h ago
Privacy is built into the underlying layer, which is indeed different.
Indeed, most projects are remedial afterward. Dusk's approach is quite clear.
I'm also paying attention to $DUSK$, but it's taking too long to land.
The technical indicators look good, but when will it explode? Question mark.
By the way, how many projects are really doing serious development now, rather than just taking the money and running?
View OriginalReply0
WalletDetective
· 15h ago
Underlying privacy design is indeed scarce, but this thing still depends on ecosystem implementation.
Over the years in the blockchain space, my taste in Layer 1 public chains has become more and more selective. To be honest, with "one-click chain deployment" everywhere now, simply competing on TPS no longer has much appeal. What truly moves me are those that solve real problems with irreplaceable technical designs. That’s also why I’ve developed a strong interest in the Dusk chain.
To put it simply, Dusk is not just a blockchain; it’s more like an operating system tailored for financial privacy. Going through its technical documentation, the integration of Piecrust virtual machine and zero-knowledge proofs indeed has a unique approach. Most projects in Web3 treat privacy as a marketing gimmick or a patch added after the fact. But Dusk is different — privacy is built into the core from the ground up, inherently included.
What does this mean? Smart contracts can directly perform logic operations on encrypted data. In other words, we can run complex business matching, blind auctions, or even payroll distribution on-chain, with minimal data risk. Just imagining this space gets me a little excited.
Holding $DUSK feels like conducting a "technological faith" experiment for me. When the market isn’t doing well, seeing the development team still pushing code on GitHub and the testnet gradually refining — that sense of participation is far beyond what buying meme coins can offer. I understand clearly that real technological implementation takes time, and from code to ecosystem explosion is a long process. But just look at those core technical indicators, the potential of $DUSK has always been there.