Hello everyone, I am a seasoned internet technology professional. Today, I will not talk about the flashy terminology of Web3 but analyze the recently popular project Allora (ALLO) from a product manager's perspective.
**Core Positioning**: Decentralized oracle network primarily solving AI and blockchain data flow issues. In simple analogy, it’s like an API marketplace for data interfaces—DApp developers need off-chain data, oracle nodes provide verification, and then users can earn staking rewards from ALLO call fees.
**From a business logic perspective, three dimensions**:
First is the user value chain. Participants either profit from arbitrage during new token launches or stake holdings to earn node dividends, similar to a paid membership system in the internet world. It sounds quite clear, but there is an underlying risk—growth logic overly depends on the continuous influx of new users.
Second is the funding background. Top crypto funds like Polychain and Framework Ventures are involved, indicating the project has solid financial backing. The technical team is also strong; members like Nick Emmons have over ten years of experience in the crypto industry, essentially endorsed by major tech experts. But—here’s the key point—there are actually few publicly announced large-scale developer collaborations, so short-term growth may rely more on user staking to attract new users. If new user growth slows down, dividend income faces a risk of decline.
Operationally, it’s quite user-friendly, with no holding thresholds, USDT can be used directly to buy, and transaction fees are only about 0.1%.
**Community Popularity**: 120,000 followers on Twitter, over 5,000 online on Telegram, and interactions seem quite genuine without obvious zombie followers.
**Two logical flaws to watch out for**:
First, the oracle track itself is already a red ocean with fierce competition; technical barriers are not obvious, making differentiation difficult for newcomers. Second, if new user growth slows, the sustainability of the entire economic model comes into question.
**Prudent advice**: If you want to participate, keep it within 5% of your total funds, avoid chasing high prices, and the holding period should preferably not exceed one week. The crypto market is always riskier than you think, and this applies to any project.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
P2ENotWorking
· 3h ago
It's the same old story of oracles and AI; we've heard these words so many times that they're tiresome. Truly product-driven projects are scarce.
---
Getting a 5% return within a week is the norm for these kinds of projects—they rely on new users to keep them alive.
---
There are so few partnership cases yet you're still bragging—it's a bit hollow.
---
Polychain's endorsement is impressive, but it can't hide the fact that the market is already saturated. Where's the differentiation?
---
Staking dividends are a common tactic in the crypto world; growth slows down and a crash is imminent—I knew this long ago.
---
Low transaction fees are good, but with such high model risks, what's the point of optimizing costs?
---
Having 120,000 followers doesn't mean much; what's important is actual usage and the developer ecosystem—this is the real test.
---
A suggestion not exceeding one week is brilliant—it's probably the most honest person in the crypto space.
View OriginalReply0
Anon4461
· 10h ago
Red Sea competition can't create differentiation, and the moment new user growth slows down, it's game over. Sounds like the same old routine as the previous project.
View OriginalReply0
ReverseFOMOguy
· 10h ago
Relying on luck for IPOs, staking depends on newcomers... Honestly, it's still the old tricks. The oracle track is completely rotten.
View OriginalReply0
PanicSeller69
· 10h ago
Honestly, I'm already tired of the oracle track; it's the same old fundraising endorsement routine.
View OriginalReply0
SerRugResistant
· 10h ago
Is this another new rookie harvesting machine? How many times have we talked about the red ocean competition? The dividend model is still the old routine.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoPunster
· 10h ago
Laughing and losing this one, and here comes another new leek harvesting machine
New user referral bonuses? I know this logic too well, it's just a pyramid scheme with a different disguise
In the red ocean of oracles, flowers are blooming from the competition. Can Allo differentiate itself? Wake up, you're dreaming
Within five points, you can run in a week. This is the survival guide in the crypto world, everyone
Endorsements from big shots are just endorsements, but I haven't seen any real application cases. How does this make money?
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingerMiner
· 10h ago
To be honest, the oracle space is very complex, and the intense competition in the red ocean hits the nail on the head.
Hello everyone, I am a seasoned internet technology professional. Today, I will not talk about the flashy terminology of Web3 but analyze the recently popular project Allora (ALLO) from a product manager's perspective.
**Core Positioning**: Decentralized oracle network primarily solving AI and blockchain data flow issues. In simple analogy, it’s like an API marketplace for data interfaces—DApp developers need off-chain data, oracle nodes provide verification, and then users can earn staking rewards from ALLO call fees.
**From a business logic perspective, three dimensions**:
First is the user value chain. Participants either profit from arbitrage during new token launches or stake holdings to earn node dividends, similar to a paid membership system in the internet world. It sounds quite clear, but there is an underlying risk—growth logic overly depends on the continuous influx of new users.
Second is the funding background. Top crypto funds like Polychain and Framework Ventures are involved, indicating the project has solid financial backing. The technical team is also strong; members like Nick Emmons have over ten years of experience in the crypto industry, essentially endorsed by major tech experts. But—here’s the key point—there are actually few publicly announced large-scale developer collaborations, so short-term growth may rely more on user staking to attract new users. If new user growth slows down, dividend income faces a risk of decline.
Operationally, it’s quite user-friendly, with no holding thresholds, USDT can be used directly to buy, and transaction fees are only about 0.1%.
**Community Popularity**: 120,000 followers on Twitter, over 5,000 online on Telegram, and interactions seem quite genuine without obvious zombie followers.
**Two logical flaws to watch out for**:
First, the oracle track itself is already a red ocean with fierce competition; technical barriers are not obvious, making differentiation difficult for newcomers. Second, if new user growth slows, the sustainability of the entire economic model comes into question.
**Prudent advice**: If you want to participate, keep it within 5% of your total funds, avoid chasing high prices, and the holding period should preferably not exceed one week. The crypto market is always riskier than you think, and this applies to any project.