My understanding of the DUSK token has become clearer step by step through usage.
Many people think that the role of a two-way bridge is just to push the price up for speculation, but its true significance lies in opening up a common pathway for asset liquidity. With fixed fees, clear waiting periods, and native assets serving as the factual basis for design—these seemingly minor operational details determine whether an ecosystem can be used frequently. Many projects can package "cool concept" cross-chain solutions, but making it into infrastructure that users will repeatedly operate weekly? That’s the real challenge.
When the public beta of DuskEVM launched, this pathway gained a new dimension. Bridging is no longer just about "moving" assets to another chain, but about enabling assets to enter a truly functional execution environment.
DUSK here has a dual identity: it is a transferable token and also plays the role of Gas. This shift is quite crucial—the demand for the token has changed from "buy and hold for appreciation" to "use once and consume once." You don’t need to participate in any grand narrative; as long as you deploy contracts, call contracts, and execute transactions, there will naturally be a real demand for DUSK. This demand won’t immediately crash the price on the market, but it is the true support for long-term value.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ApeDegen
· 8h ago
Gas fees are the real necessity; that's where true value capture happens. It's not hype, but actual usage.
View OriginalReply0
MergeConflict
· 9h ago
To be honest, this is the kind of logic I want to see. Not just "we have cross-chain now" and that's it, but something that can actually be used, something that requires spending money week after week.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanLarry
· 9h ago
ngl the real thesis here is utility burn vs. speculation pump cycle... most don't get it til the gas fees start stacking up tho
Reply0
MagicBean
· 9h ago
Finally, someone has explained it thoroughly. Most people are just dazzled by the words "cross-chain" and haven't thought about why to cross or how to use it.
The gas consumption model is indeed the key. It has turned hype into actual demand, which is the real moat.
My understanding of the DUSK token has become clearer step by step through usage.
Many people think that the role of a two-way bridge is just to push the price up for speculation, but its true significance lies in opening up a common pathway for asset liquidity. With fixed fees, clear waiting periods, and native assets serving as the factual basis for design—these seemingly minor operational details determine whether an ecosystem can be used frequently. Many projects can package "cool concept" cross-chain solutions, but making it into infrastructure that users will repeatedly operate weekly? That’s the real challenge.
When the public beta of DuskEVM launched, this pathway gained a new dimension. Bridging is no longer just about "moving" assets to another chain, but about enabling assets to enter a truly functional execution environment.
DUSK here has a dual identity: it is a transferable token and also plays the role of Gas. This shift is quite crucial—the demand for the token has changed from "buy and hold for appreciation" to "use once and consume once." You don’t need to participate in any grand narrative; as long as you deploy contracts, call contracts, and execute transactions, there will naturally be a real demand for DUSK. This demand won’t immediately crash the price on the market, but it is the true support for long-term value.