Major tech platforms face mounting criticism over inconsistent content moderation policies. When it comes to controversial topics—geopolitical events, political figures' statements, economic policies—platforms like YouTube often apply different standards. The question isn't just about *what* gets flagged, but *why* certain content faces restrictions while similar posts remain untouched. This selective enforcement raises concerns about transparency and accountability. For the Web3 community advocating decentralized alternatives, this pattern highlights why independent, rule-based systems matter. Users deserve clarity: are moderation decisions based on consistent principles, or do they shift based on external pressures? The broader issue—whether big tech properly discloses how algorithms determine what stays visible—remains unresolved.