From the project team's perspective, Four.Meme's ecosystem support mechanism is actually quite pragmatic.
Why do I say that? Many launchpad platforms share this common flaw—deciding life or death at the moment of launch, then basically letting things run on their own. Four.Meme has taken a different approach:
Let the project operate normally first, get it running. Then give it some time to verify the real situation. Is the community maintaining it consistently? Are the on-chain data healthy? Is the progress stagnating? These can all be observed.
It's not about pouring resources immediately, but about seeing if you can survive first.
What’s particularly notable is—support isn't limited to meme tokens. Tool projects, application ecosystems, even projects backed by VC teams can all apply. This at least shows that the platform has ideas and isn't trapped in the "quick money" mindset.
Whether it can produce a hit project is still uncertain, but compared to environments where projects disband after launch, for teams that genuinely want to do something, this is a more friendly survival environment.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CommunityLurker
· 11h ago
Finally, a platform that starts speaking human language, rather than just relying on hype to make a quick buck and then disappearing after launch.
View OriginalReply0
RadioShackKnight
· 11h ago
I agree with this logic; it's definitely much better than those platforms that run away after a quick grab.
View OriginalReply0
liquidation_surfer
· 11h ago
Let's focus on surviving first, I agree with that.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleInTraining
· 11h ago
This logic definitely has some substance; it's not just a quick pump and done.
From the project team's perspective, Four.Meme's ecosystem support mechanism is actually quite pragmatic.
Why do I say that? Many launchpad platforms share this common flaw—deciding life or death at the moment of launch, then basically letting things run on their own. Four.Meme has taken a different approach:
Let the project operate normally first, get it running. Then give it some time to verify the real situation. Is the community maintaining it consistently? Are the on-chain data healthy? Is the progress stagnating? These can all be observed.
It's not about pouring resources immediately, but about seeing if you can survive first.
What’s particularly notable is—support isn't limited to meme tokens. Tool projects, application ecosystems, even projects backed by VC teams can all apply. This at least shows that the platform has ideas and isn't trapped in the "quick money" mindset.
Whether it can produce a hit project is still uncertain, but compared to environments where projects disband after launch, for teams that genuinely want to do something, this is a more friendly survival environment.