The core dilemma plaguing the AI era today: contributors go unrecognized, creators burn out, and motivation evaporates overnight.



But here's what most people miss—this isn't just an ethics issue. It directly threatens AI's long-term quality and sustainability. When contributors get zero recognition or rewards, the talented ones stop showing up. The flywheel breaks: fewer skilled participants means degraded datasets. Lower data quality cascades into weaker AI models. That's the real cost hiding behind every "free contribution."

Without proper attribution and incentive systems, you don't just lose good people. You lose the entire foundation that quality AI depends on. The problem compounds itself.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
WhaleWatchervip
· 17h ago
Nah, this is something Web3 has long seen through: decentralized incentives are not fake.
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwichMakervip
· 17h ago
Yeah, that's right. This is a problem that Web3 has been solving for a long time... Isn't the on-chain incentive system designed for this? Why is the traditional AI community only realizing it now?
View OriginalReply0
wrekt_but_learningvip
· 17h ago
Honestly, data annotators these days are just being used like cattle and horses. No one cares about their well-being, and sooner or later, the data quality will collapse.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt