Many people think that the cryptocurrency market is just a high-risk betting arena, until they actually get involved in DeFi and realize that the mechanism design here is quite interesting. Recently, many around me have been trying a combined strategy involving USD1 stablecoin and governance tokens of certain DeFi platforms, and the results have been pretty good.
USD1 is a stablecoin pegged to the US dollar, while governance tokens are tools used by some DeFi projects to incentivize users and distribute profits. Looking at these two separately, there's nothing particularly special, but combining them makes the logic quite intriguing.
The operation process of this approach is as follows: users first deposit mainstream cryptocurrencies supported by the platform as collateral, then borrow a batch of USD1 stablecoins. Next, they redeposit the borrowed USD1 into the platform to participate in liquidity mining, earning governance token rewards. Simply put, it's collateralizing assets to borrow stablecoins, then using those stablecoins to mine.
Why do platforms design such a model? Frankly, the platform's goal is to expand asset scale and trading depth. USD1 plays the role of "liquidity blood" in the ecosystem—lending, storing, trading—all require its circulation. Governance tokens act like a "carrot," attracting users to participate deeply, locking more assets, and increasing the overall liquidity and activity of the ecosystem. To earn more governance tokens, users naturally continue to increase their operations and investments on the platform, forming a mutually reinforcing cycle.
The brilliance of this model lies in how it aligns the interests of participants and the platform through incentive mechanisms. However, it's also important to recognize that such high returns usually come with corresponding risks, including smart contract risks, liquidation risks, market volatility risks, and more.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OnchainGossiper
· 9h ago
Wow, isn't this leveraged mining? How did they package it as a new trick? The liquidation risk is really intense.
View OriginalReply0
NFTArchaeologis
· 9h ago
Isn't this just a modern Ponzi scheme with a different on-chain disguise? The polite term is "ecological cycle," but essentially it's just latecomers paying for the early adopters' profits.
It may look like a clever design, but it's actually a classic incentive game— as long as new money keeps flowing in, everyone can make a profit. When the influx stops someday, someone will have to bear the liquidation risk.
The combination of USD1 and governance tokens... to put it bluntly, it's using the liquidity of stablecoins to mask the true value of the tokens. Those who could mine and make money early on were actually overdrawing the principal of later participants.
It's not that you can't participate, but for those projects promoting "low risk and high returns," it's recommended to thoroughly read the contract audit reports first. Every economic model in the digital world ultimately boils down to one question: where does this profit come from?
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerWallet
· 10h ago
Borrowing stablecoins to mine governance tokens, this doll game setup does have some tricks, but I'm worried that if the contract bugs out one day, it could lead to a complete loss of funds.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-3824aa38
· 10h ago
To be honest, this strategy looks profitable, but I'm still a bit afraid of being liquidated... I almost lost everything last time.
View OriginalReply0
MultiSigFailMaster
· 10h ago
That's right, this is a "borrowed coin mining" nested game... On the surface, it looks like a win-win, but in reality, it's just the platform bleeding users dry.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationHunter
· 10h ago
It's the same old trick of mining with stablecoins, just a different coin this time.
Liquidation risk is the real concern. A sudden dip led to liquidation, and instead of gaining the carrot, I got cut.
I've been tired of the nested borrowing scheme for a long time. High APY always comes with high risk.
What if the USD1 peg fails? That's what I really care about.
The ecosystem liquidity looks good, but the question is who will take the final baton?
Many people think that the cryptocurrency market is just a high-risk betting arena, until they actually get involved in DeFi and realize that the mechanism design here is quite interesting. Recently, many around me have been trying a combined strategy involving USD1 stablecoin and governance tokens of certain DeFi platforms, and the results have been pretty good.
USD1 is a stablecoin pegged to the US dollar, while governance tokens are tools used by some DeFi projects to incentivize users and distribute profits. Looking at these two separately, there's nothing particularly special, but combining them makes the logic quite intriguing.
The operation process of this approach is as follows: users first deposit mainstream cryptocurrencies supported by the platform as collateral, then borrow a batch of USD1 stablecoins. Next, they redeposit the borrowed USD1 into the platform to participate in liquidity mining, earning governance token rewards. Simply put, it's collateralizing assets to borrow stablecoins, then using those stablecoins to mine.
Why do platforms design such a model? Frankly, the platform's goal is to expand asset scale and trading depth. USD1 plays the role of "liquidity blood" in the ecosystem—lending, storing, trading—all require its circulation. Governance tokens act like a "carrot," attracting users to participate deeply, locking more assets, and increasing the overall liquidity and activity of the ecosystem. To earn more governance tokens, users naturally continue to increase their operations and investments on the platform, forming a mutually reinforcing cycle.
The brilliance of this model lies in how it aligns the interests of participants and the platform through incentive mechanisms. However, it's also important to recognize that such high returns usually come with corresponding risks, including smart contract risks, liquidation risks, market volatility risks, and more.