2026-01-18 16:24:36

A leading project will officially release its airdrop white paper on January 18th. The previous stable 100U/1GP guaranteed rule may come to an end. If they switch to a mode of sharing 20 million GP weekly, it means that the subsequent participation cost for point interactions will significantly increase. This indeed presents a good opportunity for early participants who have laid out in advance. It is worth noting that this shift from a fixed guarantee to a dynamic distribution reflects the project's reconsideration of the ecological health when adjusting its incentive mechanism. The increase in point interaction costs will also directly impact users' enthusiasm for participation and ecological activity in the future.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-7b078580

· 11h ago

Data shows that this mechanism will eventually collapse, although early birds did indeed get the gains... Let's wait and see the details in the white paper.

View OriginalReply0

MEVSandwichMaker

· 11h ago

Is the 100U guarantee gone? Things are heating up --- Early participants indeed had fun, but later leeks are feeling a bit uncomfortable --- Wait, did they really change the rules? I need to quickly do the math --- From fixed to profit sharing, is the project trying to filter people out? --- Oh my, costs are rising, so activity levels must drop --- Early bird winners get the prize, latecomers are all cannon fodder --- The white paper will be clear on the 18th, it's too early to say anything now --- Healthy ecosystem? Honestly, they just want to cut costs --- Rising participation costs = users will leave, this logic makes sense --- The days of 100U are gone

View OriginalReply0

DeFiGrayling

· 12h ago

Here comes the rule change again, early entrants are the ones who profit --- Lost the 100U guarantee? Does that mean my previous operations were a huge win --- Dynamic allocation sounds advanced, but it's actually just a way to indirectly take from latecomers --- Early birds do have an advantage, it all depends on how the white paper is written --- Rising costs might actually lead to decreased activity, this logic is a bit counterproductive --- It's great to have an early layout, users will need to think carefully before participating later --- From fixed to dynamic, the project team is walking a tightrope --- 20 million GP weekly distribution, is this a large amount? I feel like I have no concept --- The white paper will reveal the truth on the 18th, anything said now is pointless --- Higher costs actually scare people away, what does this project want to do

View OriginalReply0

OldLeekMaster