The S&P 500's equity risk premium sitting at 2.41% tells an interesting story: US large-cap stocks are still the move compared to parking money in 10-year TIPS.
Here's the kicker – your capital doubles in roughly 17 years holding SPY. Same $100K in TIP? You're waiting 39 years. That's a massive gap.
When traditional finance shows this kind of disparity, it shifts how we think about portfolio construction. The risk-return trade-off keeps tilting toward equities, even when bond yields look tempting on the surface.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ZkSnarker
· 17h ago
ngl the 17 vs 39 year math is just unfair... equities printing while bonds collect dust. risk premium doing its thing i guess
Reply0
SmartContractRebel
· 17h ago
Forget it, I find this data a bit confusing... Doubling in 2017 vs doubling in 2039, does this mean "Don't be silly and buy bonds"?
View OriginalReply0
OnChainDetective
· 17h ago
Wait, doubling in 2017 vs doubling in 2039... Why does this data look so symmetrical? Feels like something's been glossed over.
View OriginalReply0
Ser_APY_2000
· 17h ago
Doubling in 17 years vs doubling in 39 years, this gap... Should I really go all in on US stocks?
View OriginalReply0
AllInDaddy
· 18h ago
Doubling in 17 years vs doubling in 39 years? That's a huge difference, why even consider bonds?
The S&P 500's equity risk premium sitting at 2.41% tells an interesting story: US large-cap stocks are still the move compared to parking money in 10-year TIPS.
Here's the kicker – your capital doubles in roughly 17 years holding SPY. Same $100K in TIP? You're waiting 39 years. That's a massive gap.
When traditional finance shows this kind of disparity, it shifts how we think about portfolio construction. The risk-return trade-off keeps tilting toward equities, even when bond yields look tempting on the surface.