Meme coins are really heating up in this track. Not long ago, there was still debate over whether this was a fleeting phenomenon or a new paradigm, and now projects are entering the scene with a combination of AI + automatic dividends—trying to redefine participation models in the crypto community during the "Chinese meme coin explosion" window.
The core logic isn't complicated: implement automatic dividend mechanisms to turn the concept into a continuous cash flow, amplify dissemination through AI content matrices, and finally achieve long-term operation through ecosystem binding. It all sounds like routines, but the key is whether anyone is actually hardware-izing these ideas.
From the holder's perspective, daily dividends are automatically credited, which is more attractive than mere airdrop expectations. Even more interesting is that the higher the community activity and ecosystem prosperity, the thicker the dividend pool—effectively turning token holders into ecosystem shareholders, with profits directly linked to ecosystem growth. This design indeed resembles a self-sustaining cycle more than traditional one-way value transfer in meme coins.
Regarding AI-generated content, it involves native Chinese internet memes like "Workplace perpetual motion machine" or "Love marathon," then connecting multi-chain ecosystems to spread content from a single community to the entire ecosystem. This broad dissemination can easily generate network effects, especially in meme coins driven by community consensus.
Of course, the problems are also obvious. The lifespan of meme coins largely depends on community stickiness and genuine growth. While automatic dividend mechanisms are useful, continuously attracting new funds to sustain the dividend pool is a significant pressure. Moreover, although AI-generated content can create buzz, whether it can truly become cultural DNA remains to be seen over time.
From a project design perspective, this approach indeed aims to elevate meme coins from pure speculation to something supported by an economic model—at least on a conceptual level, it seems more thoughtful than traditional methods that "die after a few months." Whether it will succeed depends on subsequent community operations and ecosystem capacity.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CascadingDipBuyer
· 8h ago
It's the same old story again, automatic dividends + AI memes, sounds impressive but in reality just exploiting new investors.
Is there really no one who can come up with new tricks? This track is all the same mold.
To keep the dividend pool going, you have to keep draining new investors; everyone understands this principle.
AI-generated memes have no cultural DNA; it's hilarious—just a traffic harvesting machine.
View OriginalReply0
SerumSquirter
· 8h ago
Automatic dividends sound great, but isn't it still relying on new people to take over?
The AI meme production line just keeps operating, but I'm worried it will eventually become a tool for precise韭菜 harvesting.
Can this round really last until the next cycle? I remain skeptical.
The dividend pool can't be filled, everything is just for show.
During this window period of Chinese meme coins, anyone who can survive until next year is worth studying.
No matter how fancy the套路, the logic can't escape the three basic principles—let's see who has stronger execution.
It still depends on whether the community has genuine stickiness; otherwise, no matter how much AI content there is, it won't save the situation.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsTinfoilHat
· 8h ago
It's the same old automatic dividend scheme, sounds more reliable than traditional meme coins but that's about it.
Will this truly cultivate culture or just another round of cutting leeks? Let's see how the community operates later.
The dividend pool needs to keep growing, fresh blood must flow continuously, it's tough.
AI memes can be popular for a while, but can they become a core part of the DNA? I remain skeptical; time will tell.
The self-circulating system sounds great, but no one knows how long it can actually run.
This design is definitely more thoughtful than before, but we'll see if it's just a good-looking structure with poor execution.
Holding tokens and becoming shareholders sounds sweet, but only if the pool is substantial; otherwise, dividends are meaningless.
The idea of cross-chain dissemination of Chinese memes has a lot of potential, but how about execution?
View OriginalReply0
DeFiGrayling
· 8h ago
Is it another scheme of dividend payouts to cut leeks? Sounds good, but I still need to see the data speak.
How long can AI-generated memes stay popular? I really want to see if they can truly become cultural genes.
The daily dividend scheme sounds appealing, but how long can the desire for new blood to enter the market last?
Honestly, it all depends on whether there's real economic support; relying solely on hype will definitely lead to a cool-down.
The more sophisticated the tactics, the greater the risk. Is this really different this time, or just another round of cutting?
View OriginalReply0
ConsensusDissenter
· 9h ago
Constantly hyping the self-sustaining system, but in the end, it still depends on new people taking over
Whether the dividend pool is thick or not, honestly, it still depends on how many newbies can be attracted
AI content matrix sounds impressive, but when the community cools down, it's just a bunch of nonsense
Daily dividends? First, ask who is actually making money
It's another economic model, another ecosystem binding. After playing these tricks for so many years, does anyone still believe?
It's called an upgrade in disguise, but really, it's just trying to get you to keep buying coins to support the dividend pool
This design is just a rehash of the same old tricks; in the end, it's still a game of pass-the-backet
I just want to see how long this project can last
Meme coins are really heating up in this track. Not long ago, there was still debate over whether this was a fleeting phenomenon or a new paradigm, and now projects are entering the scene with a combination of AI + automatic dividends—trying to redefine participation models in the crypto community during the "Chinese meme coin explosion" window.
The core logic isn't complicated: implement automatic dividend mechanisms to turn the concept into a continuous cash flow, amplify dissemination through AI content matrices, and finally achieve long-term operation through ecosystem binding. It all sounds like routines, but the key is whether anyone is actually hardware-izing these ideas.
From the holder's perspective, daily dividends are automatically credited, which is more attractive than mere airdrop expectations. Even more interesting is that the higher the community activity and ecosystem prosperity, the thicker the dividend pool—effectively turning token holders into ecosystem shareholders, with profits directly linked to ecosystem growth. This design indeed resembles a self-sustaining cycle more than traditional one-way value transfer in meme coins.
Regarding AI-generated content, it involves native Chinese internet memes like "Workplace perpetual motion machine" or "Love marathon," then connecting multi-chain ecosystems to spread content from a single community to the entire ecosystem. This broad dissemination can easily generate network effects, especially in meme coins driven by community consensus.
Of course, the problems are also obvious. The lifespan of meme coins largely depends on community stickiness and genuine growth. While automatic dividend mechanisms are useful, continuously attracting new funds to sustain the dividend pool is a significant pressure. Moreover, although AI-generated content can create buzz, whether it can truly become cultural DNA remains to be seen over time.
From a project design perspective, this approach indeed aims to elevate meme coins from pure speculation to something supported by an economic model—at least on a conceptual level, it seems more thoughtful than traditional methods that "die after a few months." Whether it will succeed depends on subsequent community operations and ecosystem capacity.