As the XPL price faces pressure, on-chain activity has not declined in tandem—this phenomenon warrants a closer look.
Indeed, unlocking sell pressure has always existed, and the candlestick chart does look quite uncomfortable. But if you only focus on the price, you might miss key signals. Looking at Plasma's on-chain data reveals interesting points: the actual stablecoin holdings haven't significantly shrunk; instead, the number of transfers and transaction frequency are steadily increasing.
What does this indicate? Speculative funds are exiting, that's a fact. But users with genuine demand are not following the trend to withdraw. To use an analogy—many people queued outside a restaurant have left, but the tables inside are still full. For a public chain focused on stablecoin circulation, the latter determines its survival.
At this stage, the market is essentially testing Plasma's true value. After removing the speculative bubble, can this chain sustain itself through real cross-border payment needs and settlement applications? From a few large transfers, it’s clear that enterprise-level cross-border settlements are becoming normalized—this is what we call the "boring but stable fundamental base."
If Plasma can weather this unlocking cycle and the on-chain stablecoin ecosystem remains intact, the bottom price may indeed be near. Market enthusiasm will fluctuate, but the users who continue to buy are the true foundation supporting the asset's value.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CryptoPunster
· 5h ago
Damn, finally someone understands. The price is dropping so painfully, but on-chain activity is actually increasing? That's unbelievable.
Speculators are fleeing, but real users haven't moved. That's worth more than anything, understand?
Wait, are you saying the scalpers outside the restaurant have all left, but the diners inside are still there? Then this restaurant really has something.
If Plasma can truly survive the unlock period, the price might really bottom out. But the premise is—stop messing around with new concepts, sticking to legitimate cross-border settlements is the real deal.
This is called separating the false from the true. Although it's uncomfortable, we have to admit this logic holds.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseLandlord
· 15h ago
The restaurant analogy is spot on; that's exactly the point. Prices may drop, but the number of transactions is still increasing, and that's the real deal. If speculators leave, they leave—after all, they weren't here to use it in the first place.
View OriginalReply0
airdrop_whisperer
· 15h ago
Alright, finally someone sees this point. Prices may fall, but on-chain data is the real truth.
Those who only watch K-line charts and call for shorts should wake up. Stablecoin reserves are stable, and transfer frequency is still increasing. What does this indicate? Corporate users haven't left.
Self-sustaining growth is well said. Compared to chains that rely on hype, Plasma's "boring" fundamentals actually have a longer lifespan.
Getting through the unlock cycle is the watershed moment. Whether real circulation value can be created depends on the next one or two months.
View OriginalReply0
BrokeBeans
· 15h ago
To be honest, the chart looks unattractive but the data doesn't lie. That's the real point worth paying attention to.
View OriginalReply0
zkProofGremlin
· 15h ago
The restaurant analogy is excellent, but to be honest, it still depends on how long enterprise-level settlements can last. Increasing trading frequency alone is not enough; we need to see whether those big players have genuine demand or are just shaking out their positions.
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingersFrontrun
· 15h ago
The restaurant analogy is good, but the key is when the restaurant owner can start making money. On-chain activity ≠ real cash income; this depends on the chain's fee model.
As the XPL price faces pressure, on-chain activity has not declined in tandem—this phenomenon warrants a closer look.
Indeed, unlocking sell pressure has always existed, and the candlestick chart does look quite uncomfortable. But if you only focus on the price, you might miss key signals. Looking at Plasma's on-chain data reveals interesting points: the actual stablecoin holdings haven't significantly shrunk; instead, the number of transfers and transaction frequency are steadily increasing.
What does this indicate? Speculative funds are exiting, that's a fact. But users with genuine demand are not following the trend to withdraw. To use an analogy—many people queued outside a restaurant have left, but the tables inside are still full. For a public chain focused on stablecoin circulation, the latter determines its survival.
At this stage, the market is essentially testing Plasma's true value. After removing the speculative bubble, can this chain sustain itself through real cross-border payment needs and settlement applications? From a few large transfers, it’s clear that enterprise-level cross-border settlements are becoming normalized—this is what we call the "boring but stable fundamental base."
If Plasma can weather this unlocking cycle and the on-chain stablecoin ecosystem remains intact, the bottom price may indeed be near. Market enthusiasm will fluctuate, but the users who continue to buy are the true foundation supporting the asset's value.