2026-01-18 16:35:11

You ever notice how some contracts are basically rigged from the start? This one literally goes from FWGary to EZ—and honestly, the naming says it all. Like, what's the actual play here? The whole thing screams 'goodbye to your bags' from the jump. Unless I'm missing something obvious, the deck looks completely stacked against anyone buying in.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-cff9c776

· 2h ago

From FWGary to EZ, this naming logic is basically a confession of a rug pull... --- The supply and demand curve tells me that the "artistic value" of this kind of project only exists in the dealer's ledger. --- Honestly, I just want to know who dares to go all-in on this contract, they must have a very strong mental resilience. --- A perfect illustration of what Schrödinger's decentralization means—project teams are both in control and not in control. --- This is the best lesson Web3 has taught me—just by looking at the name, you can see the ending.

View OriginalReply0

MeaninglessGwei

· 17h ago

Wow, the naming is so straightforward, from FW to EZ, it's like saying "noobs stay away." I could tell at a glance that this contract is definitely a black box operation. If the contract is named like that and people still don't run, how much are they willing to gamble? Basically, it's just a scam to harvest new investors, there's nothing worth watching. People still rush into this obviously fake stuff, truly incredible.

View OriginalReply0

TokenVelocityTrauma

· 01-18 17:04

Bro, this name is really clever. From Gary to EZ, scammers don't usually go this far openly. At first glance, it's clearly a trap. Entering means giving away your head. I've seen this kind of contract several times. Same old tricks. Wake up, everyone.

View OriginalReply0

LightningPacketLoss

· 01-18 17:02

Haha, this naming is really clever, going directly from FWGary to EZ, essentially making it a synonym for "intelligence tax."

View OriginalReply0

SleepyArbCat

· 01-18 17:01

Another obvious honeypot, FWGary to EZ, this naming is directly mocking... My wake-up time is limited, but I can see through this at a glance.

View OriginalReply0

rekt_but_not_broke

· 01-18 16:49

Haha, FWGary to EZ, this naming is ridiculous, they clearly aren't trying to hide it. --- It's another classic scam to fleece retail investors, I'm already tired of it. --- The contract name is so obvious, and people still dare to enter? I really admire that. --- Wait, is this real? What kind of name is FWGary, it feels like mocking retail investors. --- Basically, it's a trap. Entering = sending money, there's no way out. --- Can such contracts even be listed? What about the review process? --- Damn, here comes another one, always the same trick. When will they learn to be a bit smarter?

View OriginalReply0

MoonMathMagic

· 01-18 16:42

Damn FWGary to EZ, this naming is really brilliant, with no concealment at all. This contract clearly follows the typical scam pattern, it was bound to blow up. Another feast for the whales, a graveyard for retail investors. On the nice side, it's high risk; on the harsh side, it's robbery. I just want to know how many more people will be fooled by this name.

View OriginalReply0

BloodInStreets

· 01-18 16:35

From FW to EZ, the naming is just too straightforward... It's just telling you "sell and leave." This kind of trap is obvious at a glance; missing out is more annoying than being trapped. Another pump-and-dump scheme, I've learned to be smarter. Blood fundraising for blood transfusion, this game is unplayable. The contract names are mocking retail investors, truly ironic. Controlling the market is obvious; next time, I will definitely skip this kind. Is this the value trough? I scoff.

View OriginalReply0