Another project team has run away with the funds. The DUCKY team has completely shattered the community's trust—they initially recruited a group of big holders to endorse, create hype, and build confidence, then turned around and took the money. Several well-known accounts involved in promoting are now in a awkward position, being used as tools. This kind of scheme is common in the crypto world; project teams leverage influential accounts to create false consensus. Once the project is launched or funding is secured, they immediately disappear. This is a painful lesson for investors—no matter how big the endorsement account, caution is necessary. The most important factors are the project's on-chain transparency and compliance. The DUCKY incident is another wake-up call.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OvertimeSquid
· 01-18 17:05
Another bad script, DUCKY really dropped the ball this time. Those big influencers who were exploited are now so embarrassed, haha.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-1a2ed0b9
· 01-18 17:05
Here we go again, the tricks in the crypto world really never end... Endorsements by big influencers can't be trusted, you still have to look at on-chain data.
View OriginalReply0
PonziWhisperer
· 01-18 16:57
Cut again, this routine really should be renamed "Crypto Circle Instant Frozen Dumplings"
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-2fce706c
· 01-18 16:43
I've always said this trick, and people in the crypto circle are still repeating the same mistakes, it's really speechless.
---
DUCKY this time, I warned about a similar scam pattern two years ago, but the market is still being exploited...
---
How should I put it, this is why I keep emphasizing the importance of on-chain data, don't trust empty promises.
---
Here we go again, knowing full well it's the same old trick, yet people still rush in, it's a mindset issue.
---
Endorsement by a well-known account? Haha, that stuff is worth little, the core still depends on the team's real identity and the transparency of the treasury.
---
Every time there's a scam, someone says "This is the last time," wake up, brother, it's always the same trick.
---
Investors should learn their lesson; follower count ≠ project reliability. How can some people still not understand this logic?
---
Honestly, the DUCKY incident is a living lesson. Just follow the steps to avoid the pitfalls, don't try to gamble on luck.
Another project team has run away with the funds. The DUCKY team has completely shattered the community's trust—they initially recruited a group of big holders to endorse, create hype, and build confidence, then turned around and took the money. Several well-known accounts involved in promoting are now in a awkward position, being used as tools. This kind of scheme is common in the crypto world; project teams leverage influential accounts to create false consensus. Once the project is launched or funding is secured, they immediately disappear. This is a painful lesson for investors—no matter how big the endorsement account, caution is necessary. The most important factors are the project's on-chain transparency and compliance. The DUCKY incident is another wake-up call.