The longstanding issues in the crypto payment sector have remained unresolved for years—speed and security often trade-offs. The USDT storm at the beginning of 2025 served as the best lesson: network congestion, exorbitant Gas fees, broken cross-chain liquidity, and over 140,000 investors liquidated in a single day, losing over $300 million. The word "stability" associated with stablecoins has also taken a hit.
It is precisely these market pain points that have spurred new ideas. Unlike other public chains that pursue all-in-one solutions, Plasma has chosen a different path—focusing solely on stablecoin payments. Fast, cheap, and reliable—these three principles are embedded in the project's DNA.
On the technical side, to put it plainly, its PlasmaBFT consensus mechanism, combined with the Rust-based Reth client, can confirm transactions within seconds and remains fully compatible with EVM. Developers don’t need to learn new things; major DeFi players like Curve, Maker, and Aave are already integrating.
What truly catches attention is the Multi-Asset Memory Layout (MAML) scheme. Different types of assets like USDT and pBTC have optimized storage architectures tailored to their characteristics, preventing congestion caused by interference, while each asset retains its native features—USDT transfers are fee-free, and Bitcoin can participate directly in DeFi without cumbersome wrapping processes.
This design philosophy is quite interesting: instead of competing through hardware stacking or price wars, it aims to fundamentally optimize the underlying logic and maximize the features of various assets. Comparing this to the numerous cross-chain issues faced last year, this approach seems to have found a new breakthrough.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FlashLoanLarry
· 7h ago
Finally, someone is stubbornly tackling the long-standing issue of payments, but can it really be implemented successfully?
View OriginalReply0
BanklessAtHeart
· 7h ago
Wait, zero transaction fees to transfer USDT? If this can truly stabilize, I’ll believe it.
Another project focused on "dead-end scenarios." Let’s see how long it can survive first.
Does onboarding major Curve whales mean it’s reliable? I doubt it... depends on actual transaction volume.
This time, it won’t be another case of technical brilliance dragging down the business, after the lesson of 300 million USD, it hasn’t been that long.
MAML sounds good, but can multi-asset isolation really completely solve congestion? I remain skeptical.
Fast, secure, cheap—these three essentials are claimed by every project. But who has truly achieved them?
It's Plasma again. Can it really break through this time?
To be honest, last year's liquidation wave was really brutal, but I still have some doubts...
MAML sounds great, but can it actually work in practice?
Are they all on Curve? That depends on the real data.
Zero fees sound great, but liquidity is the key.
But this approach is indeed better than those public chains; focusing is more reliable than being all-encompassing.
Maybe we should wait for mainnet data; no matter how good the hype now, it’s useless.
Feels like another Savior project. Hopefully this time it’s not just air...
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseLandlord
· 7h ago
It's Plasma again. Can it really change the current situation this time?
If I had known earlier, I should have cut my position during that USDT wave. Hearing about 300 million liquidations sounds so hopeless.
Zero fees sound great, but I'm worried it might be another PPT project.
However, the idea of MAML is indeed fresh. It's more reliable than those all-in-one solutions.
Wait, Bitcoin directly participating in DeFi? If that really happens, Wrapped assets might become unemployed.
It still depends on whether the ecosystem can truly keep up. Just having advanced technology is useless.
Let's see how Curve responds first. The choices of big players are more convincing than the white paper.
They say confirmation in seconds, and Gas is still so cheap? Feels like they're just making promises again.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeVictim
· 7h ago
Another "Complete Solution"? Let's wait and see.
I've been fooled by the same promises too many times...
Zero transaction fees sounds a bit suspicious; some projects have claimed the same before.
MAML sounds good, but will it really go live and run smoothly? Question mark.
Curve needs to actually integrate before it counts; it's too early to say anything now.
Direct participation of Bitcoin in DeFi? If that could really be achieved, it would have exploded long ago.
Losing $300 million in a day? Now hearing about funding news, I already have psychological shadows.
Seconds-level confirmation sounds great, but I'm afraid it might just be on paper.
The longstanding issues in the crypto payment sector have remained unresolved for years—speed and security often trade-offs. The USDT storm at the beginning of 2025 served as the best lesson: network congestion, exorbitant Gas fees, broken cross-chain liquidity, and over 140,000 investors liquidated in a single day, losing over $300 million. The word "stability" associated with stablecoins has also taken a hit.
It is precisely these market pain points that have spurred new ideas. Unlike other public chains that pursue all-in-one solutions, Plasma has chosen a different path—focusing solely on stablecoin payments. Fast, cheap, and reliable—these three principles are embedded in the project's DNA.
On the technical side, to put it plainly, its PlasmaBFT consensus mechanism, combined with the Rust-based Reth client, can confirm transactions within seconds and remains fully compatible with EVM. Developers don’t need to learn new things; major DeFi players like Curve, Maker, and Aave are already integrating.
What truly catches attention is the Multi-Asset Memory Layout (MAML) scheme. Different types of assets like USDT and pBTC have optimized storage architectures tailored to their characteristics, preventing congestion caused by interference, while each asset retains its native features—USDT transfers are fee-free, and Bitcoin can participate directly in DeFi without cumbersome wrapping processes.
This design philosophy is quite interesting: instead of competing through hardware stacking or price wars, it aims to fundamentally optimize the underlying logic and maximize the features of various assets. Comparing this to the numerous cross-chain issues faced last year, this approach seems to have found a new breakthrough.