The era of quick money seems to be coming to an end.
Looking at the current market—the upward trend is no longer continuous, hot spots change rapidly, and projects that rely purely on emotional hype are starting to be exposed. In such an environment, choosing the right rhythm for a project becomes especially critical.
Plasma's approach is relatively conservative. Whether looking at price movements or trading pace, $XPL shows no signs of reckless emotional overextension. It moves steadily, with gradual corrections. Although it may not seem like a hot topic at first glance, this rhythm actually aligns better with the oscillating market pattern.
From a chip distribution perspective, trading volume is not concentrated at a few key time points, indicating that there are still many patient funds participating in the market. This contrasts sharply with projects dominated by short-term traders and also reduces the risk of chip loosening.
Community discussions are also quite interesting. Most conversations focus on the project's development direction, and the calls for "rise, rise, rise" are not that loud. This discussion atmosphere usually suggests that the project has not been sidelined but is instead being rationally examined and evaluated.
At this stage, when choosing projects, you shouldn't just focus on short-term performance. The key is whether the project can maintain its fundamentals when market enthusiasm wanes. We still need to watch Plasma's future development, but based on the current situation, its rhythm and the market cycle are not in conflict.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SelfSovereignSteve
· 8h ago
Stabilizing the market is much more difficult than speculating on concepts; this is true skill.
View OriginalReply0
ZKProofEnthusiast
· 8h ago
A prudent narrative is indeed better than reckless sentiment, but does this attract new investors?
View OriginalReply0
Ser_Liquidated
· 8h ago
Projects that stabilize the market are indeed more resilient and much more reliable than those one-hit wonders.
The era of quick money seems to be coming to an end.
Looking at the current market—the upward trend is no longer continuous, hot spots change rapidly, and projects that rely purely on emotional hype are starting to be exposed. In such an environment, choosing the right rhythm for a project becomes especially critical.
Plasma's approach is relatively conservative. Whether looking at price movements or trading pace, $XPL shows no signs of reckless emotional overextension. It moves steadily, with gradual corrections. Although it may not seem like a hot topic at first glance, this rhythm actually aligns better with the oscillating market pattern.
From a chip distribution perspective, trading volume is not concentrated at a few key time points, indicating that there are still many patient funds participating in the market. This contrasts sharply with projects dominated by short-term traders and also reduces the risk of chip loosening.
Community discussions are also quite interesting. Most conversations focus on the project's development direction, and the calls for "rise, rise, rise" are not that loud. This discussion atmosphere usually suggests that the project has not been sidelined but is instead being rationally examined and evaluated.
At this stage, when choosing projects, you shouldn't just focus on short-term performance. The key is whether the project can maintain its fundamentals when market enthusiasm wanes. We still need to watch Plasma's future development, but based on the current situation, its rhythm and the market cycle are not in conflict.