Market makers and institutions are most afraid not of high or low fees, but of their trading strategies being fully visible on the chain. Order intentions, position movements, trading counterparts—if all these are watched closely, they can be sniped at any moment. Many public chains claim to welcome institutions, but the default transparency on the chain actually discourages them.



Dusk's approach is quite practical: sensitive data is not broadcast across the entire network but is locked in the execution layer. Using zero-knowledge proofs for validation, transaction details can be hidden, but the system can prove that you are following the rules and that assets are not being mishandled. During audits, selective disclosure is also possible. This isn't about creating mystery but about bringing the traditional financial concept of "layered information" onto the chain.

The real considerations are just a few: first, whether there are actual compliant assets running on it in the future; second, whether transaction data can be externally verified; third, whether developers find writing contracts convenient. As long as two of these three are achieved, Dusk shifts from being a "privacy concept stock" to a truly usable trading infrastructure.
DUSK-34,97%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GhostAddressHuntervip
· 16h ago
Exactly right, transparency is like a gallows for institutions; even a single order can be targeted. Who would dare to come?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-6bc33122vip
· 01-18 21:54
Oh, this is what big institutions truly care about. High on-chain transparency makes it impossible to retain large investors. Dusk's zero-knowledge proof logic indeed understands the traditional financial rules better.
View OriginalReply0
ContractFreelancervip
· 01-18 17:55
Exactly right, on-chain transparency is a double-edged sword; institutions simply can't play with it.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoHistoryClassvip
· 01-18 17:53
honestly this is just 2008 playbook repackaged lol. institutions screaming about "transparency" while desperately needing opacity to function... *checks notes* yeah we've seen this movie before. dusk's basically trying to sell privacy as infrastructure instead of just admitting they want to hide whale moves from retail. nothing new under the sun fr fr
Reply0
CoffeeNFTradervip
· 01-18 17:53
This is the true understanding of institutional needs. Balancing transparency and privacy is indeed a challenge.
View OriginalReply0
ChainMelonWatchervip
· 01-18 17:45
To be honest, on-chain transparency is indeed a nightmare for institutions... However, Dusk's zero-knowledge proof logic sounds quite reliable.
View OriginalReply0
MerkleTreeHuggervip
· 01-18 17:44
Basically, it's about covering up the big players' weaknesses; otherwise, they'd have been kicked out long ago.
View OriginalReply0
VitalikFanboy42vip
· 01-18 17:28
Someone finally said it: transparency is like hell for big fish.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)