Bitcoin stands as one of the most significant technological inventions in recent history—though we can certainly argue about whether its impact has been positive or negative overall. What's striking is how systematically overlooked it was during its formative years. For roughly the first decade-plus of its existence, Bitcoin's importance was consistently underrated by mainstream observers and institutional players. The asset's true disruptive potential took considerable time to be recognized and understood by broader markets.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LayerZeroHero
· 7h ago
Those early people really had no vision. It's now too late to regret.
View OriginalReply0
YieldWhisperer
· 7h ago
lol "disruptive potential" — actually the math on early adoption curves doesn't check out half as clean as people pretend. but yeah, hindsight bias is wild when everyone suddenly acts like they *totally* saw it coming
Reply0
TokenTherapist
· 7h ago
Being underestimated early on was truly unbeatable; now I regret not getting on board.
View OriginalReply0
OnChainDetective
· 7h ago
nah the real story is in the transaction patterns from 2009-2012 tbh. most people weren't "overlooking" it—they literally couldn't parse the data. institutional blindness tied directly to their inability to trace wallet clustering back then. statistical evidence suggests deliberate ignorance over actual oversight.
Reply0
GasFeeSobber
· 7h ago
What do those early hackers say now? That's hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
liquidation_watcher
· 8h ago
I should have known to buy some BTC earlier; no one really took it seriously back then.
Bitcoin stands as one of the most significant technological inventions in recent history—though we can certainly argue about whether its impact has been positive or negative overall. What's striking is how systematically overlooked it was during its formative years. For roughly the first decade-plus of its existence, Bitcoin's importance was consistently underrated by mainstream observers and institutional players. The asset's true disruptive potential took considerable time to be recognized and understood by broader markets.