2026-01-18 17:29:44

The mechanism design of this project is indeed impressive. The dual logic of automatic dividends + destruction essentially makes the entire process operate in a decentralized manner, leaving little room for centralized siphoning. What's even more rare is that the founding team maintains a very low holding ratio; such a design is quite uncommon in the crypto space—most project teams are eager to hold large amounts themselves.

The performance after launch was even more outrageous, doubling in the first hour. While short-term surges are easy to hype, from a comprehensive perspective of the project's mechanism design, this is truly a project worth paying long-term attention to. When it comes to the potential of a ten-thousand-fold coin, projects with such innovative mechanisms and team restraint are actually more likely to be underestimated.

If you're interested in projects with this kind of decentralized design, you can delve deeper into the specific operational logic of this project, but the most important thing is to conduct thorough risk assessment.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MEVHunter_9000

· 01-18 22:20

Doubled in the first hour? This logic of dividend + burn is indeed quite something, and the team is so restrained—rare in the crypto world. --- Wait, is this mechanism about to dump again? Let’s see how it performs later. --- Decentralized operation sounds good, but risk assessment really needs to be done—don’t get caught in another trap. --- Automatic dividends + burn? Interesting, but I’m already tired of the hype about doubling in the first hour. --- Low team holding ratio is a plus, but for a thousandfold coin... we still need to wait for the answer over time. --- The mechanism design is indeed restrained, which is very rare in the crypto space and can easily be overlooked. --- Whether it doubles or not, it’s hard to tell if it’s genuine growth or just a bag-holder acting up. --- The dual logic of dividends + burn sounds good. Decentralized designs are increasing, but few can actually be implemented. --- Low team holdings? Maybe, or maybe they just haven’t taken profits yet. --- These kinds of projects are indeed easily underestimated, but long-term attention is recommended—just don’t go all-in.

View OriginalReply0

BackrowObserver

· 01-18 17:58

Wow, the team is really disciplined. This is almost a rare species in the crypto world. I can't quite understand how it doubled in the first hour; it still feels like just hype. The mechanism is indeed impressive, but I'm worried it might turn out to be another rug pull scheme. I'll wait and see; proper risk assessment is necessary. Such a low holding ratio? Could the team really be that honest? I don't believe it. The dual burn logic sounds good, but it depends on how it performs in the long run. Billion times coin? Haha, I'll just watch others get rich quietly. Automatic dividends sound great, but I need to figure out how to actually use it. This time, it really feels different, but as always, gotta stay cautious.

View OriginalReply0

ProofOfNothing

· 01-18 17:48

Doubling in the first hour? I've seen this trick too many times, and few can survive more than three months. No matter how good the mechanism is, it can't stop human greed. In the end, it's all about who runs away first. Low holdings are indeed rare, but it could also be to avoid risks... Clever move. Let's wait and see, but I usually just check on these kinds of projects every now and then. You can't put all your eggs in one basket. The dream of a thousandfold return is just that—a dream. Team restraint? Haha, you'll see what "restraint" really means once liquidity is drained. Dividends + burn sounds appealing, but how much actual profit can there be... not necessarily. Risk assessment for these projects sounds easy, but how many people actually do it? Low holdings are a plus, but I also want to see how the community is doing—that's the real indicator. Doubling isn't surprising; the key is not to follow the trend and chase high. That's how many people get caught.

View OriginalReply0

GameFiCritic

· 01-18 17:42

Mechanism design indeed has potential, but I need to study the parameters and indicators of the deflation + dividend combination before drawing conclusions. --- It's rare to see a team with low holdings, but it also depends on the actual liquidity distribution and lock-up periods; otherwise, it's pointless. --- Doubling in the first hour? To me, that's actually a risk signal. We need to observe the subsequent user retention curve before making any judgments. --- Decentralized design looks good, but sustainable growth is the real test. Many projects can boast in the first three months, but only show their true colors after half a year. --- Wait, the team restraining holdings... doesn't mean there's no room for profit-taking. It depends on the balance between liquidity pool setup and mining incentives. --- Honestly, I've seen quite a few projects like this. No matter how good the hype, they still have to pass the ROI efficiency and product lifecycle tests. --- Doubling isn't surprising; the key is whether it can withstand market clearing. Those seemingly perfect mechanisms often can't stand the test of real trading volume.

View OriginalReply0

NftBankruptcyClub

· 01-18 17:41

The team really has a conscience, unlike other project teams who are all vampires... Doubling in the first hour? How many people need to get on board for that... Honestly, the mechanism looks good, but I'm still a bit afraid of being cut. Automatic dividends + destruction? Sounds good, just not sure how long it can last. It's true that this type of project is undervalued, but the problem is how to determine which one is not the next to go to zero... I agree that the team holds a small amount of tokens, at least there's less worry about a dump. I'll hold a little first and give it a try; after all, early-stage projects are mostly gambling. Sounds like this time might be different? But I still don't dare to go all in.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-4745f9ce

· 01-18 17:35

The fact that the team doesn't hoard coins is indeed rare; most are projects that siphon from themselves. Doubling in the first hour sounds great, but such a surge... always feels like a trap waiting to happen. Decentralized design is good; the key is whether it can sustain in the long run. This mechanism design really hits the pain points of the crypto circle; worth exploring further. Brothers who go all-in for doubling, be careful not to end up as the last bag holder. Automatic dividends + token burning sound fancy, but only sustained operation proves its viability.

View OriginalReply0