2026-01-18 17:30:11

Investment judgment and market sentiment often tend to obscure the truth. Let go of these distractions and look at it from a different perspective—evaluate a project as a genuine user, and the standards become surprisingly clear.

My top three criteria are simple: Is it usable? Is the logic sound? Is it still maintained?

This set of standards keeps me focused on Plasma, because of the pragmatic vibe it exudes. It doesn't frequently change rules just to make a splash, and in many areas, it even appears somewhat restrained. In the short term, this might seem insignificant, but for users, this restraint is a stable promise—there's no need to worry about rules suddenly reversing, or a magical cycle where one set of rules is replaced by another tomorrow.

Looking at XPL's role within the entire ecosystem, it’s not an object being repeatedly hyped up in isolation, but rather an organic part of the system. The token price will fluctuate, of course, but these fluctuations don't hijack the user experience. Many complaints are not about the market ups and downs themselves, but about the irrationality of projects blindly following market trends and adjusting directions recklessly—Plasma remains relatively clear-headed in this regard.

Honestly, Plasma still has many issues that require time to verify. Will its functional iterations continue? Can the ecosystem truly become richer? After the user base grows, can it still maintain this stability? These questions have no answers in the short term.

But the signal being sent now is clear enough: first, solidify the foundation, then consider new features. This sense of rhythm is exactly what many L2 and ecosystem projects lack.

XPL-4,34%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MEVSandwichVictim

· 01-18 17:57

Able to use, logic, maintenance—these three points really hit the mark. Most projects can't even do this, and they are busy hyping concepts every day. To be honest, Plasma's restraint is indeed different; it doesn't follow the trend and mess around with rules blindly. This is really rare in the crypto world. I'm just worried about whether they can stick to it in the future. It still depends on whether the ecosystem can truly take off. I agree that XPL is not being hyped separately, so it won't become just another tool for scythe-like harvesting like other coins. Wait, does this logical consistency refer to technology or economic models? Feels like these two are indistinguishable. Nothing much to see in the short term; it all depends on whether it can survive the cold market. Many projects have failed here.

View OriginalReply0

PretendingToReadDocs

· 01-18 17:57

This self-control is indeed rare, but how long it can last is really uncertain. Don't rush to take action, wait another six months and see. As long as it works, everything else is虚的. I praise Plasma's gameplay, but the ecosystem is too weak. To put it nicely, it still depends on the coin price to speak. Are there still projects these days that change rules aimlessly for fundraising? That's interesting. Laying a solid foundation is good, but I'm afraid it's always just laying foundations. If XPL is just a supporting role, don't expect too much in terms of price increase. The three questions asked me to feel exhausted; I really can't find answers in the short term. I'm tired of projects with暴涨暴跌; Plasma's style is comfortable. Not being绑架ed by coin prices in user experience is worth learning from.

View OriginalReply0

0xTherapist

· 01-18 17:54

That's right, the ups and downs of the coin price can't hide whether the project is actually being used. The restrained pace of Plasma actually makes people feel more assured, unlike some projects that keep changing their tricks every day. Really, compared to those projects with overwhelming publicity, I trust this low-key and steady approach more. There are not many projects that can persist in building solid fundamentals. Wait, how is XPL's TVL now? Are there real user growth data? I feel that's the real standard to test whether a project is truly pragmatic. If Plasma can withstand the next bear market without wavering, then it will be truly convincing. It's still too early to draw conclusions now. Your way of thinking has inspired me a bit. I used to focus too much on market trends and indeed overlooked the actual progress of the project. I need to change this bad habit.

View OriginalReply0

WenAirdrop

· 01-18 17:52

Pragmatism is indeed rare; most projects have long been eager to rush ahead. --- Exercising restraint actually makes one seem a bit impressive. There are not many projects that avoid blindly following the trend to harvest quick gains. --- Usability, logical consistency, ongoing maintenance—simple and straightforward but effective—these few standards are actually more trustworthy. --- XPL not being hyped up alone actually makes people feel more at ease. I agree with this logic. --- However, whether the ecosystem can really take off remains a question. Time will tell. --- Compared to those who change rules daily and indulge in self-amusement, Plasma’s quiet and steady approach is indeed different. --- Nothing much can be seen in the short term, but this sense of stability is valuable to users. --- You're right. Most L2 projects lack this patience and always want to reach the top in one step. --- I've heard many times that a solid foundation is important, but I want to see who actually does it. --- Price fluctuations are just fluctuations; the key is that the experience isn’t being hijacked.

View OriginalReply0

SleepTrader

· 01-18 17:44

Restraint is indeed rare; most projects have already started crafting stories. There are very few projects that don't follow the trend and blindly adjust their direction. Function iteration is the key; don't just lay the foundation and talk without action. A solid foundation sounds good, but few can truly stick with it. Too many projects have their user experience hostage to price fluctuations; Plasma is okay in this regard. Rules should not be repeatedly changed; this basic promise has now become a luxury. First, see if the user base can truly grow; everything else is just superficial. The richness of the ecosystem determines everything; it's still hard to see clearly. Hold on, and you'll win; patience now has become the biggest competitive advantage. The level of maintenance cannot be faked; the results will be clear next year.

View OriginalReply0

DeFiChef

· 01-18 17:39

You are absolutely right. Compared to projects that change rules every day, Plasma's restraint is indeed steady. Usable, logical, and still in development—these three straightforward and effective qualities. XPL has already won more than half the battle by not being harvested like a leek.

View OriginalReply0

LightningWallet

· 01-18 17:36

Really, compared to projects that change rules every day, Plasma's restraint is actually more reassuring. Usability, clear logic, and ongoing updates—these three are enough; everything else is noise. Price fluctuations don't matter; the key is not to let rules hijack user experience. Being pragmatic is indeed rare; most L2s are currently just messing around. However, the richness of the ecosystem still depends on future developments; there's no short-term answer. Strengthening the foundation before expansion makes this pace much more comfortable.

View OriginalReply0