Dusk Network is redefining blockchain infrastructure with the Zedger protocol. This is not just hype about a new concept, but a practical solution to a longstanding industry challenge—how to meet compliance and audit requirements while protecting user privacy.



Traditional public blockchains either excel at privacy or transparency, but rarely both. The hybrid privacy model adopted by Dusk breaks this binary choice.

**How does the Isolated Byzantine Agreement (SBA) work?**

Dusk divides network nodes into two layers—the verification layer and the privacy layer. The verification layer uses BFT consensus to process transaction validity, achieving fast block times (3 seconds per block). The privacy layer employs zero-knowledge proofs (ZK-SNARKs) to conceal sensitive data. What is the result? Auditors can see transaction links and verify compliance, while users’ specific private information remains hidden. Empirical data shows that compared to pure PoS solutions, this mechanism reduces energy consumption by 70% and enhances resistance to Sybil attacks by three times. CertiK has already approved the security audit.

**How is cross-chain transfer privacy addressed?**

The answer is the Secure Tunnel Swap (STS) protocol. When users want to transfer USDC from Ethereum to Dusk chain, traditional methods expose transaction details, including amounts, during the process. STS differs—using atomic swaps and homomorphic encryption, users only need to disclose an amount range (e.g., "$10,000–$100,000"), with the exact value hidden via zero-knowledge proofs. This approach fully complies with GDPR’s data minimization principles. Currently, STS supports interoperability with major chains like Ethereum and Solana.

The significance of this technical solution is that privacy and compliance are no longer mutually exclusive. Web3 applications can both protect user data and meet regulatory requirements.
DUSK0,34%
ETH1,46%
USDC-0,02%
SOL3,09%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BlockchainArchaeologistvip
· 5h ago
Can privacy and compliance be balanced? Interesting, it depends on whether Dusk can really survive.
View OriginalReply0
NeverVoteOnDAOvip
· 14h ago
Can you save 70% of energy consumption? That's incredible, is it really that powerful? --- Privacy and compliance can be satisfied at the same time, it feels like a dream haha --- Wait, CertiK passed the audit? Then I need to seriously check out Dusk --- Zero-knowledge proofs have been hyped for so long, Dusk finally adopted them --- Finally, someone is directly addressing the cross-chain privacy issue; before, everyone acted like they couldn't see it --- No way, how was the 3x increase in resistance to the Byzantine attack measured? Is there data? --- Homomorphic encryption combined with ZK-SNARKs, this combo is quite something --- Can compliance and privacy really be achieved simultaneously? Feels like there are pitfalls --- Are Ethereum and Solana now supporting interoperability? Then liquidity shouldn't be an issue --- Is this just another PPT project? I've already been scammed enough times
View OriginalReply0
ZenChainWalkervip
· 01-18 17:57
Privacy and compliance are finally no longer a trade-off; this is the way Web3 should go.
View OriginalReply0
LayoffMinervip
· 01-18 17:54
Finally, someone is seriously addressing the conflict between privacy and compliance, not just talking the talk. --- Can 70% energy consumption be saved? Is this data reliable? --- Separating the privacy layer and verification layer is a good idea, but I wonder how it will be deployed in practice. --- The 3x increase in resistance to witch attacks is quite impressive. Even with CertiK's approval, more observation is needed. --- Cross-chain privacy is indeed a big issue. The STS approach finally has some novelty. --- Implementing GDPR rules on-chain? Sounds suspicious; the real test is in actual application results. --- Can compliance and privacy truly be achieved simultaneously? It still depends on regulatory attitudes. --- Zero-knowledge proofs are back to save the day. When will this technology truly become widespread?
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroJunkievip
· 01-18 17:48
Wait, 70% energy savings? Where did this data come from to be so outrageous --- Can privacy and compliance really go hand in hand? I still find it a bit hard to believe --- Is the ZK-SNARK stuff reliable? Feels like there are more projects hyping it up --- CertiK passes security audits and that's enough? Uh... I think I'll just wait and see --- Cross-chain privacy is indeed a pain point, but it's hard to say how far Dusk can really go --- Another "redefining" term, this phrase is getting overused --- Three-second block times sound pretty good, but how much is the gas fee?
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrybabyvip
· 01-18 17:46
Saving 70% of energy consumption? Now that's the real deal!
View OriginalReply0
GhostChainLoyalistvip
· 01-18 17:46
Can privacy and compliance truly be achieved simultaneously? I'm a bit looking forward to seeing the data from actual implementations.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)