Sonic's handling method after the first season airdrop is worth noting. The more than 16 million S tokens that were unclaimed were not reallocated by the project team but were directly burned through fully automated permissionless smart contracts. The interesting aspects of this approach are: first, consistency between words and actions, as the promised mechanism was executed exactly as promised, with no mid-course rule changes. Second, transparency is ensured through technical means, without relying on manual operations by the project team, so everyone can clearly see the logic behind each step. This kind of execution capability is actually rare in project governance.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TokenomicsShaman
· 6h ago
Directly destroying over 16 million tokens? That's quite something. At least it's more transparent than those projects that secretly moved assets into vaults.
View OriginalReply0
LeverageAddict
· 6h ago
Wow, Sonic directly destroyed 16 million tokens this time. Truly bold, unlike some projects that secretly move tokens into the treasury.
View OriginalReply0
pumpamentalist
· 6h ago
Really, Sonic directly destroys unclaimed tokens, which is much more reliable than projects that change rules every day.
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamer
· 6h ago
Hey, really, Sonic's move this time is indeed fierce. Over 16 million tokens were directly burned, with no room for negotiation, just done like that.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleWatcher
· 6h ago
Really, this move is quite straightforward... Just destroy as soon as you say so, no complicated tricks, it's rare.
Sonic's handling method after the first season airdrop is worth noting. The more than 16 million S tokens that were unclaimed were not reallocated by the project team but were directly burned through fully automated permissionless smart contracts. The interesting aspects of this approach are: first, consistency between words and actions, as the promised mechanism was executed exactly as promised, with no mid-course rule changes. Second, transparency is ensured through technical means, without relying on manual operations by the project team, so everyone can clearly see the logic behind each step. This kind of execution capability is actually rare in project governance.