The staking data of DUSK is quite interesting. On-chain, 120 million DUSK are locked, accounting for 12% of the total supply of 1 billion. The annualized yield is displayed openly—around 3% to 4%. Honestly, this isn’t very competitive in the overall market.
But that’s not the most critical issue. The more painful part is that ordinary users who stake can’t participate in block production. Validator status requires KYC verification, which means staking rights and validation rights are artificially separated.
From the perspective of traditional finance, this is almost unappealing—low returns, restricted rights, and scrutiny. Yet in reality, 68% of addresses holding tokens have a single position of over 100,000 tokens, with an average lock-up period exceeding 200 days. These numbers are somewhat abnormal.
The real turning point is here: these people are not chasing APY. They are voting with their actions. Staking DUSK for them isn’t about financial gains but about a systemic choice—that is, saying "I support a compliant, programmable future."
In the broader Web3 context where staking is often seen as a simple yield channel, DUSK’s design takes the opposite route. Staking isn’t about earning more tokens; it’s about taking a stand. This setup is destined to be niche, attracting only the most core believers—those willing to accept opportunity costs in exchange for long-term institutional trust.
So looking at DUSK’s staking data, it may seem somewhat dull on the surface, but a closer look reveals it’s highly purified. It doesn’t seek traffic or speculators—only consensus and committed supporters. In a market full of short-term gambles, this kind of "inefficient" loyalty becomes the most valuable asset.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasOptimizer
· 6h ago
This is the real filtering mechanism, way more effective than any airdrop whitelist.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseVagrant
· 6h ago
Hey, I buy this logic. Staking is voting, it makes sense.
---
This compliance approach is basically about filtering people. Those who truly believe stay, players disperse.
---
3% to 4% APY Haha, that's really dull nowadays.
---
An average lock-up period of 200 days, these folks are definitely not here to make quick money.
---
I actually think this precisely shows that DUSK has something. Not relying on high yields to attract, but on consensus to retain people.
---
KYC is a dead end for retail investors, but it also prevents trash from coming in. In a way, that's a good thing?
---
From a voting perspective, this completely reverses the market's short-term logic. Brilliant.
---
Separating staking rights and validation rights, these folks are still willing to lock for 200 days, which shows true faith.
---
Inefficient loyalty, this phrase should be engraved on a monument. In this market, it's the most scarce.
---
It feels a bit like screening for followers—no traffic, just promises. Cold, but pure.
---
DUSK's move is like doing a "reverse bloodsucking pump." Refreshing.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeBarbecue
· 6h ago
Uh... does this compliant future sound a bit like a new way to cut leeks? I might as well buy government bonds with a 3-4% APY.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureLiquidator
· 6h ago
Compliance staking, niche followers, team alignment logic... DUSK has got some substance.
View OriginalReply0
IntrovertMetaverse
· 7h ago
This logic is a bit absolute; staking is essentially a voting system choice... True believers will naturally stay.
View OriginalReply0
SelfRugger
· 7h ago
This is a typical case of "looks like a loss, but actually betting on long-term trust." 68% of people lock in for over 200 days and are still there? It certainly indicates something.
The staking data of DUSK is quite interesting. On-chain, 120 million DUSK are locked, accounting for 12% of the total supply of 1 billion. The annualized yield is displayed openly—around 3% to 4%. Honestly, this isn’t very competitive in the overall market.
But that’s not the most critical issue. The more painful part is that ordinary users who stake can’t participate in block production. Validator status requires KYC verification, which means staking rights and validation rights are artificially separated.
From the perspective of traditional finance, this is almost unappealing—low returns, restricted rights, and scrutiny. Yet in reality, 68% of addresses holding tokens have a single position of over 100,000 tokens, with an average lock-up period exceeding 200 days. These numbers are somewhat abnormal.
The real turning point is here: these people are not chasing APY. They are voting with their actions. Staking DUSK for them isn’t about financial gains but about a systemic choice—that is, saying "I support a compliant, programmable future."
In the broader Web3 context where staking is often seen as a simple yield channel, DUSK’s design takes the opposite route. Staking isn’t about earning more tokens; it’s about taking a stand. This setup is destined to be niche, attracting only the most core believers—those willing to accept opportunity costs in exchange for long-term institutional trust.
So looking at DUSK’s staking data, it may seem somewhat dull on the surface, but a closer look reveals it’s highly purified. It doesn’t seek traffic or speculators—only consensus and committed supporters. In a market full of short-term gambles, this kind of "inefficient" loyalty becomes the most valuable asset.