When it comes to on-chain performance, Solana's throughput and transaction speed have created a notable gap with Ethereum. The blockchain can handle significantly higher transaction volumes per second while maintaining faster confirmation times, which addresses one of the key limitations that legacy networks face during peak network activity. This performance differential has become increasingly relevant as developers evaluate which ecosystems best suit their applications' scalability requirements.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
5 Likes
Reward
5
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeSobber
· 6h ago
Solana TPS is bragging again? But to be honest, it's definitely more usable than ETH when the network is congested... But what about stability, my friend?
View OriginalReply0
liquidation_surfer
· 7h ago
Solana TPS is so impressive, but I still have to see if the ETH ecosystem is thriving. What's the use of high performance if the ecosystem isn't strong...
View OriginalReply0
MidnightTrader
· 7h ago
Sol really outperforms ETH, doesn't it? The TPS gap is right there.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-9ad11037
· 7h ago
Solana's TPS is indeed impressive, but with such a deep ETH ecosystem, just looking at speed doesn't mean much, right?
When it comes to on-chain performance, Solana's throughput and transaction speed have created a notable gap with Ethereum. The blockchain can handle significantly higher transaction volumes per second while maintaining faster confirmation times, which addresses one of the key limitations that legacy networks face during peak network activity. This performance differential has become increasingly relevant as developers evaluate which ecosystems best suit their applications' scalability requirements.