When I saw the new ecosystem support plan, I actually had some reservations. The term Launchpad is used too often, and I've seen many promises of "long-term support" as well.
However, after carefully considering this plan, I did find some differences.
The key lies in its access mechanism. It is not open to everyone, but only to those who have already launched projects within the ecosystem. This approach effectively narrows down the participant scope in advance, which is actually a way to avoid the tactics that are solely aimed at attracting new users. With this threshold in place, it can ensure quality rather than falling into a numbers game. This "selective" approach is indeed different from the indiscriminate broad casting without any filtering.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RugPullSurvivor
· 13h ago
This time it's really interesting; the selection process is much more reliable than that last wave of opportunistic fishery.
View OriginalReply0
BlockImposter
· 13h ago
Haha, finally someone is coming up with something new, not just another "全民参与" (全民参与) slogan.
View OriginalReply0
Whale_Whisperer
· 13h ago
Wow, finally someone has explained the threshold issue clearly. The previous Launchpads all followed the same套路.
This time it's really interesting; the curated system can indeed block those who try to fish in troubled waters.
View OriginalReply0
VitalikFanboy42
· 14h ago
Oh no, this time it really doesn't look fake. The curated system is definitely much more reliable than that chaotic model from last time.
View OriginalReply0
LucidSleepwalker
· 14h ago
Oh wow, this time it actually seems to have some substance. Hopefully it's not another rug pull.
When I saw the new ecosystem support plan, I actually had some reservations. The term Launchpad is used too often, and I've seen many promises of "long-term support" as well.
However, after carefully considering this plan, I did find some differences.
The key lies in its access mechanism. It is not open to everyone, but only to those who have already launched projects within the ecosystem. This approach effectively narrows down the participant scope in advance, which is actually a way to avoid the tactics that are solely aimed at attracting new users. With this threshold in place, it can ensure quality rather than falling into a numbers game. This "selective" approach is indeed different from the indiscriminate broad casting without any filtering.