2026-01-18 18:40:41

A creator received only $4,495 in rewards for over 1.2 million exposures, sparking a lot of criticism. But think about it carefully, the value behind these numbers might not be that high. How many people actually click in and read thoroughly? Most likely, they just glance at the title and image and scroll past, or casually save it without ever opening it again. This is why social media traffic numbers are so inflated. Pure exposure metrics can't truly reflect real user value; click-through rates and dwell time are the key indicators that determine content monetization potential.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BitcoinDaddy

· 6h ago

Fake data at a glance; exposure volume is just on paper for the wealthy. The real way to monetize still depends on retention and repurchase rate.

View OriginalReply0

StableBoi

· 6h ago

1.2 million exposures for $4,495? So it's just junk traffic, huh? I don't even believe anyone actually watched through this data.

View OriginalReply0

TerraNeverForget

· 6h ago

1.2 million exposures, $4495 in revenue. These numbers do look pretty uncomfortable. But on the other hand, how many people actually finish watching? --- Traffic numbers are just a facade; engagement is the real gold and silver. Many people haven't quite figured out this principle yet. --- I just want to ask, when we scroll through content, what percentage of people actually stay for more than 3 seconds? --- Click-through rate and dwell time are directly correlated; exposure volume drops accordingly. That's why some accounts have fewer followers but are highly monetized. --- To put it simply, fake exposure is a common problem on social platforms; no one can escape it. --- Those in the know understand that data inflation has long been old news. The key is actual conversions. --- So, creators need to learn how to interpret real data and not be blinded by surface-level exposure numbers.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropBlackHole

· 6h ago

Honestly, 1.2 million exposures are just a numbers game; achieving even 10% genuine engagement is already good. Everyone has been fooled by vanity metrics; traffic brokers love this set-up. The phenomenon of folders gathering dust is very real; I also have a bunch I’ve never even looked at. That’s why I prefer to have fewer fans but stronger engagement; junk traffic is meaningless. Good articles don’t have to worry about monetization; the problem is the lack of awareness in this regard.

View OriginalReply0