2026-01-18 18:41:27

Having a deep one-hour conversation with a certain tech leader, I can earn 3 million. This sounds a bit crazy, but in the crypto market, it's actually quite realistic—the perspectives of top innovators, their judgments on technology and the future, are worth far more than just this amount in terms of funding allocation. As Web3 has developed, information gaps and cognitive differences are the biggest asset disparities. Would you pay for such a conversation? Or does this price itself reflect something?

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BottomMisser

· 6h ago

3 million an hour? I just laughed. That's the ceiling of information asymmetry. The key is to see what that guy can actually dig up for you; not all big shots are worth this price.

View OriginalReply0

GasWaster69

· 6h ago

3 million per hour? That's a really aggressive price, but thinking about those who turn their fortunes around through information advantage, it doesn't seem like the craziest gamble anymore.

View OriginalReply0

BlockDetective

· 6h ago

3 million an hour? I have to say, this has been nothing new in the primary market for a long time. The key is whether you find the right person; only those who can say a sentence worth hundreds of millions are truly valuable.

View OriginalReply0

MemeCurator

· 6h ago

3 million per hour, to put it simply, is just using money to buy cognitive bias. But is this really worth it? I think it depends on who is on the other end. If it can truly change your judgment about a certain track, then maybe it's okay. However, most of the time, this kind of premium is just a variation of cutting leeks.

View OriginalReply0

DegenDreamer

· 7h ago

3 million per hour? Basically, it's just about exploiting information asymmetry, which I understand. But the real conversations that can truly change your investment decisions don't need to cost this much; on-chain data and open-source code have already made everything clear.

View OriginalReply0