2026-01-18 18:41:50

This project started planning back in May last year and has been progressing quite steadily. Recently, there have been rumors in the community about adjusting the points mechanism, and it is said that it will be changed to a fixed daily output model. The specific implementation has not been fully confirmed yet. Such ecosystem rule optimizations and adjustments are quite common; the main thing to watch is whether they can balance participation and sustainability. After all, the points system directly affects user retention and activity.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ImpermanentPhilosopher

· 6h ago

Wait, a fixed output mode? Isn't this just turning mining into clocking in for work... Could it make things more competitive and actually decrease activity?

View OriginalReply0

MEVSandwich

· 6h ago

Implementing a points system again? The first two projects have already tried this, and in the end... But fixed output does sound more reliable, just worried that execution might turn out to be another story. It's hard to say if this kind of adjustment is reliable; let's see how they balance it later. Participation is the most likely to fail, and they'll have to change it again. Fixed daily? Sounds good, but I wonder if they'll secretly change the rules again.

View OriginalReply0

Layer2Arbitrageur

· 6h ago

lmao fixed daily output? that's just disguised inflation with extra steps. lemme see the actual tokenomics before anyone gets excited

Reply0

SchrodingerAirdrop

· 6h ago

Daily fixed output? Sounds good, but I'm just worried it might be just on paper. --- The point system has been changed; it depends on whether the team is truly sincere, or it will just be another routine of cutting leeks. --- Steady progress is a good thing, but if this adjustment is messed up, it could be awkward. --- The fixed output model feels more transparent, better than the previous black box. --- The core still depends on how it is executed later; many projects sound good but are just talk. --- Balancing participation and sustainability? Uh… sounds like trying to justify inflation. --- Started in May two years ago? Why does it feel like it only gained popularity recently? I haven't heard much before. --- Talking about the points reform is easy, but when it’s actually implemented, it will definitely be another round of fuss. --- I'm just worried that after changing the points mechanism, user retention might actually decline. This thing is really hard to control.

View OriginalReply0