2026-01-18 18:42:12

The CEO of a leading compliant platform recently clarified remarks regarding the White House controversy. Previously, some media reports claimed that senior executives of the platform had intense verbal conflicts with White House officials over cryptocurrency regulations, attracting market attention. However, the CEO responded afterward, stating that the reports were inaccurate. This incident reflects the disagreements and tug-of-war between the crypto industry and government departments in policy formulation. Currently, regulatory authorities in various countries are gradually clarifying their attitudes toward digital assets, and major industry platforms are proactively aligning with compliance frameworks. Although this controversy has sparked public debate, it has also made more people realize that for the long-term development of the crypto ecosystem, establishing a healthy communication mechanism with regulatory agencies is essential. The friendliness of policies directly influences the future direction of the industry.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

StablecoinAnxiety

· 9h ago

Coming to clarify again? This routine is so familiar—start with an argument, then debunk the rumors. It's just a traffic trick.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropAutomaton

· 9h ago

Once again, media taking things out of context, all the details are wrong. --- The CEO just needs to come out and clarify; don't pay too much attention to those rumors. --- Compliance is indeed something that needs to be discussed thoroughly, or the ecosystem will be deadlocked. --- Has the attitude from the White House changed? That’s the key, right? --- Instead of arguing, it’s better to communicate more. Everyone making money is the hard truth. --- It feels like the negotiations have collapsed and need to be rebuilt, which is exhausting. --- Who can accurately judge the friendliness of policies? Anyway, it’s still in the testing phase. --- Leading platforms are all being modest and cautious; there’s no other way. --- This storm isn’t really a big deal; regulation will eventually have to get through this hurdle.

View OriginalReply0

liquiditea_sipper

· 9h ago

It's all media hype; the real situation isn't that explosive. --- It's both a clarification and a response, feeling a bit like a case of "the pot calling the kettle black." --- Basically, big platforms are bargaining with the government. Retail investors, just sit back and watch the show. --- The compliance framework should have been established long ago. Dragging it out for so long is really... --- Regarding policy friendliness, it's called communication in a nice way, but in a harsh way, it's compromise. It depends on who is more stubborn. --- The White House probably feels quite helpless too. On one hand, they want to promote innovation; on the other, they need to prevent risks. Being caught in the middle is uncomfortable for everyone. --- In the end, we are the ones who suffer. Big platforms have legal teams arguing with the government; what about individual investors?

View OriginalReply0