Solana Co-founder Questions Ethereum's Protocol Ossification Strategy

Source: Cryptonews Original Title: Solana Labs CEO questions Vitalik Buterin’s long-term blockchain thesis Original Link: Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko has challenged Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin’s vision for blockchain protocol development.

Summary

  • Yakovenko says Solana must keep iterating and warns stagnation kills protocols.
  • Vitalik argues Ethereum should function long-term without mandatory upgrades.
  • The debate contrasts perpetual innovation with resilience through ossification.

Yakovenko’s case for continuous iteration

Yakovenko argues that Solana must continue iterating indefinitely, warning that any protocol stopping its evolution to meet developer and user demands will “die.”

The exchange began when Yakovenko responded to Buterin’s post about Ethereum passing the “walkaway test.” Buterin advocates for reaching a state where Ethereum can ossify, meaning the protocol could theoretically stop receiving updates while maintaining its core value.

I actually think fairly differently on this. Solana needs to never stop iterating. It shouldn’t depend on any single group or individual to do so, but if it ever stops changing to fit the needs of its devs and users, it will die. It needs to be so materially useful to humans.

Yakovenko counters that continuous adaptation is necessary for survival, though Solana shouldn’t depend on any single organization to drive these changes.

Yakovenko’s vision for continuous Solana evolution

Yakovenko stated that Solana’s future depends on remaining “materially useful to humans” with enough active developers earning from the network’s transactions.

He envisions these developers having spare resources to contribute protocol improvements back to the open-source project.

The Solana co-founder shared a selective approach to protocol changes. While he advocates for constant iteration, he said the network must reject most proposed changes. Upgrades should target real problems facing developers and users rather than attempting to satisfy every request.

Yakovenko predicts Solana will have future versions built by contributors outside the current core teams at Anza, Solana Labs, or Firedancer. He suggested the ecosystem could transition toward a model where governance votes fund the computational resources needed to write new code.

Vitalik’s case for protocol ossification

Buterin argues Ethereum must support trustless and trust-minimized applications across finance, governance, and other sectors. He compares these to tools like hammers.

The Ethereum founder contends that applications can’t achieve true trustlessness if built on a base layer requiring ongoing vendor updates. He frames this as Ethereum needing to embody the same traits it enables for applications built on top of it.

Buterin clarified that reaching ossification capability doesn’t mean halting all protocol development. Rather, Ethereum’s value proposition shouldn’t strictly depend on features not yet implemented. The network should reach a baseline where it can function indefinitely without mandatory upgrades.

SOL-6,52%
ETH-3,14%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ChainWanderingPoetvip
· 4h ago
Ha, here we go again... Solana vs Ethereum, the old routine. Anatoly is getting impatient? Directly challenging Vitalik's paper ideas, alright, let's see what kind of tricks they can come up with this time.
View OriginalReply0
UnluckyValidatorvip
· 4h ago
Haha, Anatoly is starting to copy V God again? These two are just naturally destined to be rivals—one wants to freeze, the other wants decentralization. No one can convince the other...
View OriginalReply0
LoneValidatorvip
· 4h ago
Haha, SOL is dissing ETH again. These two really don't see eye to eye. Vitalik's theories sound nice, but can they really be implemented? Just upgrade directly, why make it so complicated? This is what Web3 should look like, efficiency first. I'm optimistic about SOL's approach, mainly in terms of stability... well. Here we go again, the two camps are about to clash. One pursues decentralization faith, the other prioritizes speed, and they just can't see eye to eye.
View OriginalReply0
SybilAttackVictimvip
· 5h ago
Haha Anatoly, are you trying to compete with V God? I've heard this set of arguments about Solana too many times; it's still the same old story.
View OriginalReply0
IfIWereOnChainvip
· 5h ago
Haha, they're at it again. When will Solana and ETH, these old rivals, finally settle down? Honestly, Vitalik's theories are starting to give me a headache, and Yakovenko's direct rebuttal is much more satisfying. I still prefer Solana's straightforward style. Does Vitalik want to turn Ethereum into a museum? Come on, wake up. That's why I bet on Solana. ETH's ossification theory really stifles innovation. Basically, the two founders have different philosophies, nothing new. Speed is everything, and V God is still dithering here.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)