This time, I won't talk about price trends, hype concepts, or play the "big explosion in the future" routine. Let's look at it from a different perspective—put yourself in the shoes of a builder, really considering launching a product on Dusk, rather than just an observer.

Dusk has touted "privacy compliance" many times, but compared to empty words, there's a more practical question: if I really want to develop an application involving regulated assets, does Dusk provide me with sufficiently clear and controllable underlying capabilities? Am I willing to put real users and real assets on it?

This isn't about writing tutorials; it's about creating my "Acceptance Checklist." The word "acceptance" sounds cold, but regulated assets should inherently be cold. Traders need excitement; builders need responsibility. How far projects like Dusk can go ultimately depends on whether these "cold" needs can be transformed into truly usable interfaces.

I have broken down the requirements into five main categories of interfaces. Each directly aligns with Dusk's core approach, and each has practical reasons for "missing it means trouble." The benefit of this approach is to avoid repetitive, cliché discussions while maximizing relevance.

**Category One: Qualification Interfaces**

What I need isn't an identity question like "Who are you," but a qualification check—"Do you meet the criteria?"

Honestly, I used to simplify compliance to KYC, but I later realized that KYC is just the surface. The real trouble lies in the qualification status itself. Regulated assets aren't accessible to everyone; participants must meet a set of qualification conditions.