2026-01-18 19:26:26

In the Web3 world, where to store data has always been a big issue. As blockchain applications grow, developers and enterprises are pondering: how can we store data quickly, securely, and truly decentralized? This is no small matter.

One project has targeted this pain point — built on the Sui chain, it combines storage, economic incentives, and high-performance storage layers, attracting participants with lower costs and more stable services. The core logic is actually simple: make the token $WAL perform multiple roles — not only paying for storage fees but also staking to earn PoS rewards, and voting on key parameters like pricing and node admission. In other words, participants are not just users but are genuinely involved in governance.

Looking at token distribution, this mechanism is quite thoughtful. About 10% is allocated for airdrop rewards to the community, 43% is invested in the ecosystem reward pool to support long-term development, and 10% subsidizes node operations. The numbers clearly show that the project places the community first.

The most interesting part is the pricing model — it adopts a market-driven + node bidding mechanism, making storage costs transparent and fair, breaking the traditional centralized platform pricing model. Nodes compete with each other, allowing users to find the most cost-effective options. This design not only reduces the risk of control by a centralized entity but also enables participants to profit from ecosystem growth.

This is why projects like this are worth paying attention to — they are not just stacking technology but are rethinking the incentive mechanisms and governance models of Web3 infrastructure.

WAL-8,92%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GlueGuy

· 6h ago

Wait, another storage project on Sui? These days, the storage track is really heating up. We need to see if $WAL's incentive design is truly attractive or just another PPT coin.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunter007

· 6h ago

Oh wow, finally someone is seriously working on storage, not just paying lip service. Once again, 43% of the ecosystem pool—this number looks familiar to me... There's a new story on Sui, but can it really take off? Let's wait and see. The multi-purpose design of the token is indeed interesting, but it depends on whether node bidding can truly lower costs. By the way, who will oversee these nodes?

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsPolice

· 6h ago

It's the same old token distribution story again. 43% to the ecosystem pool sounds good, but where the funds actually go remains a mystery. What about actual liquidity data? Node bidding sounds ideal, but in reality, will a few big players call the shots again? The WAL design is okay, but decentralized pricing is easier to talk about than to implement. With so many projects in the storage sector, why would this one survive? It all depends on the actual node distribution.

View OriginalReply0

WhaleInTraining

· 6h ago

Storing on Sui? This idea is pretty good, definitely more reliable than those air projects. --- The $WAL multi-functional token design really hits the pain points. --- Staking and governance again, it feels a bit complicated. --- 43% ecological rewards, this ratio shows that the project team really wants to play the long game. --- Market-driven pricing sounds smooth, but I'm worried that in the end, a few major nodes will have the final say. --- The transparency in storage costs is finally being taken seriously. --- The node bidding mechanism is interesting; this is true decentralization. --- Looking at the token distribution, at least it's not a typical VC scheme. --- Why does it seem like Sui's ecosystem projects are piling up recently? They're all working on infrastructure. --- Whether this incentive model can truly be implemented depends on the operational team's capabilities; anyone can come up with the logic on paper.

View OriginalReply0

LazyDevMiner

· 6h ago

I think the WAL logic is okay, but I don't know if node bidding can really bring down the costs. The Sui ecosystem has another storage project; let's see if it can survive the next quarter. The token distribution ratio looks quite comfortable, but a 10% airdrop still feels a bit stingy. Node competition sounds good, but how many people will actually participate in governance? If this model gets running, it could indeed break the monopoly, but I'm worried it might become a new tool for cutting leeks. Storage + incentives are not new anymore; the key is whether $WAL can stabilize the market.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerAirdrop

· 6h ago

Wait, the multi-purpose token design like $WAL is quite interesting, but governance tokens are usually hyped up like this, right? Oh, by the way, regarding the 43% ecosystem reward pool, we need to keep an eye on how it will be spent later. Storage projects on Sui are piling up; why is this one able to survive? A transparent pricing mechanism is a good thing, but I worry that node competition will ultimately turn into a price war. The token distribution numbers look good, but the key is to see how genuine the participation is.

View OriginalReply0