The new tokenomics model of the AI project HeyElsa, with airdrops and incentives accounting for 40%, initially looks like a common tactic chasing the trend. But at the same time on the BNB Chain, the major lending platform Lista DAO is doing something else—directly linking USDT with US Treasury bonds to provide users with a stable 4% annual yield.
It seems these two projects are taking completely different paths.
Lista has over $43 billion in assets locked, but it clearly doesn't want to stop at being just a "digital pawnshop." Its new roadmap aims to create a true financial supermarket, even exploring the old rule of "must collateralize to borrow" and experimenting with pure credit lending models. Some community voices worry that it’s spreading itself too thin, but based on the current RWA products it’s launching, at least it shows a grounded approach to product development rather than just hype.
On the HeyElsa side, the focus is on solving another pain point—making on-chain operations less complicated. Enabling you to complete transactions just through chat essentially lowers the entry barrier for the entire crypto world. Although the token model allocates a significant portion to the foundation and team, with long unlock periods, the direction is clear—technology should serve a smoother user experience.
Thinking carefully, these two are actually evolving two dimensions of the same ecosystem: the former expanding how assets generate yields and diversify pathways; the latter optimizing how people interact with the system and making it more hassle-free. Compared to any grand narrative, users care more about this—being able to earn steadily without hassle. That’s the truly attractive financial ecosystem.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SerumSurfer
· 8h ago
Speaking of Lista, this move is really aggressive—directly taking on government bonds? Compared to those projects that boast about airdrops every day, this is the real deal.
---
HeyElsa lowering the barrier to entry, I like it, but a 40% airdrop share... still the same old trick.
---
$43 billion locked in and still working on product iterations, these are the projects worth paying attention to. Much more reliable than funding news.
---
Pure credit loans? Isn't this financial innovation? The risk is really high. Is Lista trying to make a mini version of a bank?
---
Using chat for trading sounds cool, but the ones that truly make money are always those quiet, steady projects, not the ones with the most aggressive marketing.
---
RWA has indeed become this year's mandatory course. Is Lista just following the trend or really understanding the opportunity? Need to observe for a while longer.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWatcher
· 8h ago
Lista's 4% annualized return is a bit boring; directly connecting to government bonds feels like risk avoidance with no real innovation.
HeyElsa's chat trading idea is good, but the old tricks of the token model still smell bad.
By the way, locking up 43 billion for pure credit loans—does this move seem a bit too ambitious...
Stable income vs. lowering barriers—I'm optimistic about both directions, but I'm worried they might end up as tools to cut leeks.
Lista's RWA approach is solid, but can the ecosystem really accept this "boring" finance, or does it rely on airdrops to attract people?
View OriginalReply0
ZenChainWalker
· 8h ago
Lista's 43 billion really can't hold up anymore. Using government bonds as a method is indeed a bit outrageous. I'm just worried that if policies change later, everything will fall apart.
Can the HeyElsa chat trading system really be implemented? It seems every project likes to hype this up.
Stable returns vs. easy operation, I choose the former. After all, making money is the hard truth.
Both sides are just painting big pictures, but Lista at least has some actual offerings, which is a bit interesting.
Wait, a pure credit loan model? Can this on-chain system work? Who will handle the risk control?
Recently observed an interesting phenomenon.
The new tokenomics model of the AI project HeyElsa, with airdrops and incentives accounting for 40%, initially looks like a common tactic chasing the trend. But at the same time on the BNB Chain, the major lending platform Lista DAO is doing something else—directly linking USDT with US Treasury bonds to provide users with a stable 4% annual yield.
It seems these two projects are taking completely different paths.
Lista has over $43 billion in assets locked, but it clearly doesn't want to stop at being just a "digital pawnshop." Its new roadmap aims to create a true financial supermarket, even exploring the old rule of "must collateralize to borrow" and experimenting with pure credit lending models. Some community voices worry that it’s spreading itself too thin, but based on the current RWA products it’s launching, at least it shows a grounded approach to product development rather than just hype.
On the HeyElsa side, the focus is on solving another pain point—making on-chain operations less complicated. Enabling you to complete transactions just through chat essentially lowers the entry barrier for the entire crypto world. Although the token model allocates a significant portion to the foundation and team, with long unlock periods, the direction is clear—technology should serve a smoother user experience.
Thinking carefully, these two are actually evolving two dimensions of the same ecosystem: the former expanding how assets generate yields and diversify pathways; the latter optimizing how people interact with the system and making it more hassle-free. Compared to any grand narrative, users care more about this—being able to earn steadily without hassle. That’s the truly attractive financial ecosystem.