Recently, the content ecosystem in the crypto community has shown an interesting tension—on one side, a flood of various opinions and chaotic discussions; on the other side, some previously low-profile creators and media personnel are beginning to initiate rectification using new content tools, promoting higher quality content. This change is not necessarily a bad thing, but it feels somewhat unfamiliar. However, I always believe that what Web3 needs most are open voices and frequent sharing. Sharing itself is a form of connection and the vitality of the community. High-quality content will naturally accumulate, and low-quality voices will gradually fade away. Instead of passively waiting, it's better to actively participate—more sharing, more collisions—so the community can truly grow.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CrashHotline
· 4h ago
Really, instead of waiting for the influencers to organize, it's better for us to speak up more ourselves.
View OriginalReply0
BridgeTrustFund
· 4h ago
Ha, are we starting content rectification again? It seems like this logic needs to be repeated every cycle.
Sharing indeed is vital, but honestly, a mix of good and bad is the norm, right? It’s impossible for all voices to be wise.
Web3 doesn’t seek domesticated comfort, but rather the chaotic feeling of wild growth.
---
A typical fence-sitting statement, not wanting to offend anyone but also wanting to appear logical. Rectification is one thing, freedom is another; avoiding offending both sides is the real skill of this generation.
---
Basically, those with a voice are starting to redefine what "quality" means.
---
Hold on, "high-quality content naturally precipitates"? In a saturated information flow? That’ll have to wait until some future date.
---
Open voices belong to openness, but trash is still trash. You can’t rectify it without self-awareness.
View OriginalReply0
Liquidated_Larry
· 4h ago
Honestly, another round of "rectification"? It feels like this kind of thing has to be played out hundreds of times in the crypto world.
View OriginalReply0
SocialFiQueen
· 4h ago
Hmm... the wave of regulation has emerged, but isn't truly good content still something the community discovers on their own?
View OriginalReply0
failed_dev_successful_ape
· 4h ago
Basically, it's still about relying on sharing to survive; otherwise, the community will die. Those who want to do "rectification" are overthinking it a bit.
Recently, the content ecosystem in the crypto community has shown an interesting tension—on one side, a flood of various opinions and chaotic discussions; on the other side, some previously low-profile creators and media personnel are beginning to initiate rectification using new content tools, promoting higher quality content. This change is not necessarily a bad thing, but it feels somewhat unfamiliar. However, I always believe that what Web3 needs most are open voices and frequent sharing. Sharing itself is a form of connection and the vitality of the community. High-quality content will naturally accumulate, and low-quality voices will gradually fade away. Instead of passively waiting, it's better to actively participate—more sharing, more collisions—so the community can truly grow.