2026-01-18 19:40:55

Traditional assets face structural problems. Gold drains wealth through storage costs while moving slowly across markets. Bonds can't keep pace with inflation, leaving you underwater on real returns. Fiat currencies are engineered to depreciate by design. Bitcoin breaks this pattern entirely—truly scarce with a fixed supply, cryptographically verifiable, transferable as bearer property, and liquid across global markets. The system itself is broken. Bitcoin is how you fix it.

BTC-2,58%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-a606bf0c

· 4h ago

Hmm... It sounds like the old clichés of traditional finance, but honestly, the existing assets are indeed a bit dragging down the system. Gold storage fees have been quietly eating into returns, and there's no wrong in criticizing that. Bitcoin's fixed supply is indeed unbeatable, but is its liquidity really as good as it's hyped up to be? Bonds can't keep up with inflation, I agree with that. Everything is depreciating now. To put it simply, the current system is too rotten; we need a different approach. After all this time, I really haven't thought of any other solutions. The fact that supply is locked is indeed impressive, but isn't that nothing new? So the question is, is Bitcoin really the one to fix the system? The traditional financial design was originally meant to harvest the little guys, and I agree with that.

View OriginalReply0

NotSatoshi

· 4h ago

The old traditional assets are long overdue for a rewrite. Bitcoin is the way out. --- Gold depreciates just sitting there, bonds can't keep up with inflation. I'm just wondering who still believes in these. --- The fixed supply is perfect; no one can issue more than the cap. --- Fiat is just a money-grabbing machine. Wake up, everyone. --- Honestly, there are only two things: trusting the old system or trusting the code. --- After so many years of finance classes, no one dares to speak the truth so directly. --- Blockchain verification > government promises. There's nothing wrong with this logic. --- In terms of global liquidity, Bitcoin outperforms all traditional assets in seconds. --- Those holding gold should think about the costs. It's really absurd. --- The system has been broken all along. Are we only realizing it now? --- Cross-border transfers are completed in seconds. What more do you need?

View OriginalReply0

LightningSentry

· 4h ago

Bro, I'm tired of this spiel. Can you come up with some new tricks? Traditional assets are indeed trash, but is Bitcoin really the cure? I always feel like this is just another form of gambling. Let's count it out: gold devaluation, bonds can't keep up with inflation—those are true. But why jump straight to BTC as the savior? The storage costs are just a drop in the bucket compared to the volatility in the crypto world, brother. What sounds like a revolution is, frankly, just a different place to cut people's leeks.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeLover

· 4h ago

Traditional assets are indeed a trap, this point hits the mark --- Wait, the gold standard also has costs, isn't Bitcoin transaction fees way more expensive --- Fixed supply is indeed an advantage, but is liquidity really that good --- Fiat devaluation is a fact, but BTC volatility is also crazy --- You're right, the system itself has problems, but can Bitcoin completely solve them? --- I agree that storage costs drag down traditional assets, no wonder institutions are looking at on-chain assets --- True scarcity > artificial money printing, in this regard Bitcoin wins

View OriginalReply0

VitalikFanboy42

· 4h ago

Traditional assets indeed drag down the market, but can Bitcoin save everything? That logic is a bit absolute. --- Who pays for the storage costs of gold? It's a direct loss. --- A fixed supply sounds appealing, but is liquidity really that strong? --- Fiat devaluation is by design, that's true, but BTC's volatility is also crazy. --- I agree with breaking the system, but can it be fixed relying solely on BTC? Come on. --- Cryptographically verifiable is indeed a strong point; other assets really can't compare. --- Wait, bearer property is also an issue in reality, what about regulation? --- It's too idealistic to say that. Markets are not that simple. --- Global liquidity is indeed strong, but the volatility is also quite intense.

View OriginalReply0