2026-01-18 20:00:25

#数字资产市场动态 The current tokens are generally caught in套路:拼激励、控制抛压、炒稀缺……说白了都想拉高价格。但 $Max 这个项目反其道而行之，走出了完全不一样的路子。

The mechanism is straightforward: the tax generated from each transaction does not go into the team wallet nor is it eaten up by whales, but is instead automatically split via smart contract into two streams—one flows to public welfare and education, and the other is used for token buyback and burn. It seems simple, but in fact, it is redefining profit distribution: the growth benefits are automatically extended to the broadest participants (the global aid groups and all token holders), rather than being locked by a few.

Interestingly, this design actually reduces the appeal of short-term speculation. You won't find flashy incentive mechanisms, but you can see a genuine cycle: every transaction contributes to charity accumulation and automatic deflation. It attracts long-term builders who truly believe in this logic, constructing an ecosystem with social responsibility.

While the entire industry is still tinkering with financial engineering, $Max proves with the simplest code logic that the greatest value of crypto assets may lie in those promises automatically executed by code—"making the world a better place."

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DogeBachelor

· 8h ago

Ah, finally someone dares to do this. Other projects are all playing tricks, but this guy actually cut straight to the point. Truly bold. No way, is the simplest mechanism actually the most effective? It feels a bit sinister. I need to think this logic over carefully. Honestly, I'm a bit shaken. Can it really be implemented, or is this just another beautiful story? Code doesn't lie, but human nature...

View OriginalReply0

DarkPoolWatcher

· 8h ago

This logic is indeed refreshing, but can it really withstand human greed? --- Reverse operation sounds good, but the key is whether it can be implemented later --- Honestly, compared to those fancy ways of cutting leeks, this does seem much more conscientious --- Code automatic execution promises? Uh... has the contract ever had a bug? --- Finally seeing a project that wants to do something different, but still need to observe --- The combination of public welfare + deflation is interesting, just worried that the management might change their mind later --- Long-term builders? Probably all killed by short-term price fluctuations haha --- This logic sounds a bit idealistic at first glance, but I like it --- Automatic profit distribution sounds great, but who will ensure the transparency of the smart contract? --- It's rare to see a project abandon the quick leek-cutting routine

View OriginalReply0

just_here_for_vibes

· 8h ago

This is the project that truly aims to change the game rules --- Honestly, I'm tired of those tactics of cutting leeks --- Code speaks for itself, not hyping up --- Finally, someone is making money without relying on hype? --- Public welfare buyback is much more practical than any airdrop incentives --- I'm a bit shocked; this approach is really different --- But in the end, it still depends on whether it can survive --- Simple and straightforward, I like this style --- Just worried it will be ruined by capital --- Deflation plus public welfare, quite a thoughtful approach

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationHunter

· 9h ago

Honestly, this set of logic has some substance, but I still want to see real data speak for itself.

View OriginalReply0

ShibaOnTheRun

· 9h ago

I can't believe there are projects like this—transaction taxes don't go into the team wallet? That's a bit outrageous in the crypto world. Wait, the promise of automatic code execution... can such idealistic things really survive? The last sentence hit me a bit. When the industry is all about cutting leeks, is doing this really foolish or does it show some genuine intention?

View OriginalReply0