Is the threshold for DeFi really that high? Not necessarily. If you're interested in on-chain finance but don't want to dive straight into complex smart contracts, you might start exploring with Lista DAO.



What’s the most direct benefit? You can collateralize the tokens you hold and then borrow USD1— a stable asset pegged to the US dollar. In other words, you don't have to sell assets with appreciation potential, and you can obtain liquidity to seize other market opportunities. The collateralized tokens can also continue generating yields, effectively putting your assets to work.

In terms of user experience, the platform's interface is quite user-friendly. Beginners can intuitively understand each step they are taking, and risk warnings are clear, preventing blind operations. The system is mainly deployed on BNB Chain, which means fast transaction speeds and low fees—very friendly for users who perform frequent transactions.

Regarding security, it adopts an over-collateralization model— to borrow 100 USD1, you need to deposit 150 worth of assets. While this design constrains borrowers, it also significantly reduces the overall system risk. The team itself has strong backing and is strategically focused on ecosystem development in the long term.

Finally, I want to mention the community atmosphere. Users are very active here, often sharing simple yet practical strategies, and questions are responded to quite quickly. The discussion style within the community is quite down-to-earth, not superficial.

Instead of pouring money into complex DeFi projects from the start, it’s better to use small amounts to experience Lista first. Feel the process of actively managing your assets, understand it clearly, and then increase your investment. This way, the learning curve is lower, and the gains can be greater.
LISTA-11,64%
USD1-0,02%
BNB-3,21%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
RunWithRugsvip
· 4h ago
Over-collateralization still sounds a bit painful, is exchanging 150 for 100 really cost-effective? --- Another "low-threshold" project, what's actually low about it... --- Running on the BNB chain is indeed fast, but I'm just worried about another wave of disconnections, better to be cautious. --- There are many USD1 stablecoins out there, why is this one considered reliable? --- Feels like this is just collateralized lending disguised as DeFi, nothing new, right? --- Every project claims to be a small-scale test, I'm getting a bit tired of hearing that. --- Community being solid? From what I see, all DeFi communities are pretty much the same... --- If you really want to learn DeFi, instead of messing around here, it's better to just read the whitepaper. --- Why does it feel like you're selling a project? It's making me a bit uncomfortable.
View OriginalReply0
HalfBuddhaMoneyvip
· 4h ago
Small-scale testing is indeed the way to go; don't go all-in on flashy projects right from the start. --- Over-collateralization is definitely safer, but it feels a bit restrictive. --- The gas fee advantage of BNB Chain really convinced me; finally, no more feeling the pain every time I make a transaction. --- I believe in the high community activity, but you still need to do your own homework and not rely too much on others' strategy sharing. --- Using stablecoins to explore other opportunities makes sense to me, but risk control must be monitored at all times. --- A user-friendly interface is basic, but the key is whether it remains stable in the long run; avoid ending up with a mess. --- Trying out the process with a small amount first is a good idea, but remember to calculate the exchange rate and slippage costs carefully. --- Over-collateralizing 150 to get 100 feels a bit inefficient; can the borrowing ratio be more flexible? --- The biggest fear is a bug in the smart contract; even the most reliable team can't prevent that moment.
View OriginalReply0
YieldHuntervip
· 4h ago
nah the 150% collateral ratio is just... moving risk around, not eliminating it. what happens when your collateral tanks 40%? suddenly you're liquidation bait. technically speaking if you look at the data on similar protocols, the real yield after fees is barely beating inflation lol
Reply0
TheMemefathervip
· 4h ago
Sounds pretty good, but that 150% collateral ratio is a bit tight, and the liquidation risk needs to be monitored at all times.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt