2026-01-18 20:22:32

Decentralized storage is a highly competitive track, but the protocols that truly stand the test of time rely not just on technology but also on a robust economic model. WAL is a great example—its design makes the利益链条 (benefit chain) of participants very clear.

Let's start with the most straightforward part. Users uploading data to Walrus need to pay a fee. This fee has two destinations: part of it goes directly to the operators of the nodes, and the other part goes into a long-term storage fund. How is the fee determined? It’s not arbitrary; instead, it’s dynamically adjusted based on a stablecoin benchmark, so users don’t have to worry about price fluctuations impacting their budgets.

How do node operators participate? They must stake WAL. The more they stake, the more storage tasks they are assigned, and the higher their earnings. This creates a strong incentive for nodes to maintain network security. Ordinary holders can also delegate their tokens to nodes, earning rewards—effectively enabling passive capital appreciation.

Looking further into governance, WAL holders have real voting rights. Protocol upgrades, fee adjustments, and fund allocations all require voting. Essentially, this allows the community to truly control the direction of the project. The total token supply is 5 billion, with a fixed cap. The distribution plan is transparent and open—no private pre-sales or infinite token releases by the team, making the architecture quite restrained.

Currently, the amount of stored data and number of nodes on Walrus are accelerating growth. Leading projects within the Sui ecosystem are already deeply integrated. New tracks like AI agents, permanent storage media, and on-chain data markets are just beginning to heat up, and storage demand is bound to explode. As the only value anchor for the entire ecosystem, WAL’s fundamental outlook is quite clear.

Early participants are already enjoying the benefits of network effects. This logical cycle is closed, and participating in it means betting on the certainty of decentralized storage as a direction.

WAL-10,33%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

fork_in_the_road

· 7h ago

The difficulty of the economic model is indeed the line between life and death. Anyone can copy technical solutions, but this incentive system is not easy to replicate. --- The stablecoin valuation trick is clever; it directly avoids the dilemma of price spikes crashing the market. --- Sui ecosystem demand is increasing, and WAL as a value anchor really has no substitute. --- The chain of staking → tasks → rewards must be tightly closed; only when participant interests are aligned can it truly last long. --- A fixed supply of 5 billion without private placement tricks is what a serious project should look like. --- Early entrants are reaping the benefits of network effects; latercomers need to think carefully about where their position is. --- Node operation must involve staking; this design keeps speculators out, very clever. --- Delegating tokens to nodes for dividends is a way to achieve passive income; this approach is friendly to ordinary token holders. --- Real implementation of governance voting rights is crucial; many projects talk about community autonomy, but few actually execute it. --- Explosive growth in storage demand is highly probable; the key is whether WAL can stabilize its position as the only value anchor in the ecosystem.

View OriginalReply0

YieldHunter

· 7h ago

nah hold up, if you look at the data... delegation rewards always sound better on paper than they actually are. what's the real apr after slashing risk and network volatility? nobody's talking about that part lol

Reply0

governance_lurker

· 7h ago

Economic models are indeed the key to survival; the technical approach has long been overused. I do agree with the design concept of WAL—costs are shared bidirectionally with dynamic adjustments, which is indeed well thought out. However, regarding the staking incentive system, I have to say, it sounds good in theory, but can node cost control keep up during actual operation? I believe in early dividends, but I worry about later participants getting cut. A fixed supply of 5 billion is certainly more conscientious than those with unlimited issuance, but the real test is still ahead, right? It's a bit optimistic to talk about a certain direction now. Wait, when you say deep integration of the Sui ecosystem, which top projects are you referring to? We need to look specifically to determine whether it's a genuine demand or just self-hype. Honestly, this logical framework is coherent, but could it turn out to be another story of "explosive growth this year"?

View OriginalReply0

MEVSandwich

· 8h ago

Economic model robustness is the true moat; otherwise, no matter how advanced the technology is, it's useless. --- Dynamic fee adjustment for stablecoins is really clever, saving users from daily worries. --- Delegated mining is quite interesting; who doesn't love the feeling of earning passively? --- A total supply of 5 billion with transparent distribution—finally, a project that doesn't cut the leeks. --- With such deep integration into the Sui ecosystem, early adopters must be making a killing. --- NGL, this logical cycle is very tight; hitting the right direction means profit. --- The feedback loop design of node staking plus task allocation is really fierce. --- Real voting power and value anchoring—finally, a project that takes the community seriously.

View OriginalReply0

DecentralizedElder

· 8h ago

Economic models are the real key; having good technology alone is useless. WAL's staking + delegation + governance setup is indeed well understood. --- The stablecoin fee model is clever; no need to gamble on the coin price anymore. --- A total supply of 5 billion with no team unlimited releases is indeed more restrained than most projects. --- The question is whether ecosystem users will buy in. Integration of top projects in Sui is a good sign, but true explosive growth still depends on what happens next. --- Early entrants are indeed enjoying the benefits, but the concern is whether the hype will fade later. --- Staking incentive design is clear, but can node operators really make money? --- Governance voting rights sound good, but how high will actual participation be... --- The growth of Walrus data volume and nodes is a good thing, but competition in the storage market is also intensifying. --- Choosing the right direction doesn't necessarily guarantee profit; the key is whether the token liquidity is sufficient.

View OriginalReply0

NonFungibleDegen

· 8h ago

ngl tokenomics actually checks out here, but ima need to see the floor price first before i get too bullish ser

Reply0