Users shape their own content feed through choices and engagement patterns, but they can't actually control the underlying algorithm itself—that infrastructure is far too complex and massive. It's honestly a neat system to have available. Still, I find myself gravitating toward more general, foundational studies rather than relying on algorithmic recommendations. The algorithm shows you what it thinks you want, but your actual preferences? That's the real power you hold.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CodeZeroBasis
· 4h ago
The essence of the algorithm is still a black box; we ultimately can't escape it.
View OriginalReply0
PanicSeller
· 4h ago
Well said, but I still trust my own judgment more.
View OriginalReply0
fren.eth
· 4h ago
That's quite true, but I still feel that the more the algorithm understands me, the a bit creepy it becomes.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMaskVictim
· 4h ago
No matter how smart the algorithm is, it can only guess what you want; the real choice still lies in your own hands.
View OriginalReply0
RektCoaster
· 4h ago
Honestly, algorithms are just fancy recommendation engines; the real decision-making still depends on choosing for yourself.
View OriginalReply0
FlatTax
· 4h ago
That's right, the algorithm is a good kid; it learns whatever you feed it.
Users shape their own content feed through choices and engagement patterns, but they can't actually control the underlying algorithm itself—that infrastructure is far too complex and massive. It's honestly a neat system to have available. Still, I find myself gravitating toward more general, foundational studies rather than relying on algorithmic recommendations. The algorithm shows you what it thinks you want, but your actual preferences? That's the real power you hold.