The increasing complexity of the Ethereum protocol is becoming a long-term hidden risk that needs attention. As the founder of Ethereum, Vitalik Buterin recently pointed out, the continuously growing protocol complexity could pose a serious threat to ecosystem health.



This accumulation of complexity stems from multiple aspects: firstly, the ongoing expansion of functionality—each upgrade attempts to introduce new capabilities; secondly, the security model becomes increasingly difficult to verify; thirdly, developers face higher audit costs and risk management pressures.

Simple and straightforward protocol design should be the advantage of blockchain, but now this simplicity is gradually being sacrificed. While functional expansion can attract more applications, excessive complexity makes the system more vulnerable to bugs and also makes it harder for new participants to understand and contribute. This reminds the entire ecosystem that while pursuing innovation, it must also be vigilant about the accumulation of technical debt—sometimes, deleting code is more important than adding code.
ETH-4,41%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
PonziDetectorvip
· 21h ago
Vitalik is right. Ethereum is now digging its own grave, piling up features that result in a big mess. Who suffers the most from complexity explosion? Isn't it us old guys who need to audit contracts? The costs are extremely high. Deleting code is more important than adding code... This statement really hit me. Many projects just add features without reducing liabilities.
View OriginalReply0
PancakeFlippavip
· 21h ago
Vitalik is right. Ethereum is indeed a bit bloated now. Deleting code is a hundred times harder than adding code, and no one wants to take the blame for it. The higher the complexity, the more vulnerabilities there are. This truth is harsh but very realistic. Speaking of which, isn't this the common problem of all major projects? In the end, they all have to pay off their debts. It seems Ethereum needs to be ruthless and do some pruning; otherwise, the risks will only pile up higher.
View OriginalReply0
OldLeekConfessionvip
· 21h ago
Vitalik has already said it, we still have to listen. The complexity is indeed getting out of control. Deleting code is much harder than adding code. No one wants to do this job, right? These years of upgrades have become more and more fragile in the end, it's hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
FallingLeafvip
· 21h ago
Vitalik's points this time are really on point. Ethereum is indeed a bit bloated now. The code cleanup ability is there, but no one cares about security risks, huh? Deleting code is much harder than adding code, and that's the real problem.
View OriginalReply0
TopBuyerBottomSellervip
· 22h ago
Vitalik has started to reflect, and that's the right move. No matter how many features are added, it's useless if stability collapses.
View OriginalReply0
FOMOSapienvip
· 22h ago
Vitalik has already said that complexity needs to be reduced, and we're still adding new features... Truly impressive If ETH keeps piling up like this, it will eventually collapse Deleting code is much harder than adding code, that's just the reality The more complex the protocol, the more vulnerabilities it has—this logic makes sense Once again, a warning before a wave of technical debt explodes; whether it will be heeded is hard to say
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)