【BitPush】An interesting on-chain data point. A major whale recently withdrew 32,395 ETH from Binance, worth over $100 million. This guy previously borrowed $45 million USDT to buy the dip in stETH, and his current actions seem to be laying out the next move.
From the data, the whale is likely planning to deposit this batch of ETH into lending protocols like Aave, then continue borrowing USDT to buy stETH. It’s essentially playing with leverage, betting on the arbitrage space between stETH and ETH. As long as the token price doesn’t drop sharply, the borrowing interest and arbitrage spread can cover the costs. Of course, this kind of operation also carries significant risks—if the market suddenly moves in the opposite direction, liquidation risks can materialize instantly.
This type of whale activity actually reflects some market players’ views on the Ethereum ecosystem: staking derivatives present arbitrage opportunities and are worth leveraging for deeper deployment.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
StopLossMaster
· 13h ago
This move is indeed aggressive, but I think the risk has been understated. $100 million worth of ETH + $45 million USDT leverage, as long as the LTV fluctuates slightly, it can easily trigger liquidation. Paying half of the arbitrage profit on borrowing interest is normal. Whales have the size and strength, no doubt, but the stETH-ETH spread was always a pseudo-opportunity; poor liquidity is the real trap. If this guy isn't careful, he could easily become someone else's liquidation feast.
View OriginalReply0
NotFinancialAdvice
· 13h ago
I've seen this trick too many times; whales are indeed skilled. But I'm more concerned about what will happen to liquidity and borrowing rates once this $100 million enters Aave. Is the pressure on the liquidation threshold being underestimated?
View OriginalReply0
ApeDegen
· 13h ago
Whale's move this time is indeed aggressive, but I think the risk has been underestimated. The stETH arbitrage looks stable, but in reality, liquidity risk and liquidation pressure are the real killers. Once borrowing rates fluctuate or staking yields decline, leverage will turn against you.
View OriginalReply0
NervousFingers
· 13h ago
This move is indeed clever, but the risk has been underestimated. Leveraged arbitrage may seem stable, but in reality, it's like walking a tightrope. Once a $100 million position triggers liquidation, the market's reaction in that moment is impossible to anticipate. Aave's recent borrowing interest rate fluctuations have been so significant; who can guarantee that subsequent costs will be covered? I think this guy really has some guts.
View OriginalReply0
digital_archaeologist
· 13h ago
Whale's move this time is indeed aggressive, but I think the key risk point hasn't been fully explained—once Aave's liquidation price is triggered, how devastating the 32,395 ETH sell-off will be—that's the real black swan.
Whale strikes again: $100 million worth of ETH withdrawn, Aave lending arbitrage drama continues
【BitPush】An interesting on-chain data point. A major whale recently withdrew 32,395 ETH from Binance, worth over $100 million. This guy previously borrowed $45 million USDT to buy the dip in stETH, and his current actions seem to be laying out the next move.
From the data, the whale is likely planning to deposit this batch of ETH into lending protocols like Aave, then continue borrowing USDT to buy stETH. It’s essentially playing with leverage, betting on the arbitrage space between stETH and ETH. As long as the token price doesn’t drop sharply, the borrowing interest and arbitrage spread can cover the costs. Of course, this kind of operation also carries significant risks—if the market suddenly moves in the opposite direction, liquidation risks can materialize instantly.
This type of whale activity actually reflects some market players’ views on the Ethereum ecosystem: staking derivatives present arbitrage opportunities and are worth leveraging for deeper deployment.