Is Bitcoin really easier to confiscate than gold? This point is worth pondering.

【Crypto World】An interesting viewpoint has sparked discussion in the community: Is it actually easier for a country to confiscate Bitcoin than gold? This claim comes from an industry insider who is very familiar with crypto assets, raising several key questions.

First is the issue of ledger transparency. All Bitcoin transactions are recorded on the blockchain, meaning the flow of funds is transparent and traceable. Coupled with the fact that most people rely on exchanges or custodial platforms to hold Bitcoin, this gives regulators significant leverage—simply pressuring the platform can freeze assets. He even cited the precedent of the US government confiscating Bitcoin as proof.

In contrast, physical gold, while also traceable, is physically difficult to thoroughly audit. It can be stored in different locations, making regulation much more challenging.

However, this person also emphasized one point: he is not entirely bearish on Bitcoin. He simply dislikes those exaggerated claims that rely on fear-mongering and greed to promote Bitcoin. As for whether Bitcoin’s price will continue to rise? His attitude is open, and he did not give a definitive answer.