DUSK Network's positioning is quite interesting — it doesn't follow the traditional all-in-one public chain route, but rather seems to be building a foundational system specifically designed for financial scenarios. This choice in approach isn't about a particular technical parameter but about the trade-offs in the overall design philosophy.

How do general-purpose public chains operate? Their KPIs are ecosystem size, number of applications, and developer enthusiasm. But financial infrastructure is different — stability, transparent rules, and predictable outcomes are the essentials. From the project's inception, DUSK has been aiming for the latter, which is why you'll see its development pace is relatively steady, resource investment is more restrained, and it appears less "aggressive."

This can also be seen at the system architecture level. DUSK hasn't optimized for "rapid application expansion," but instead focuses on underlying capabilities like privacy, compliance, and settlement certainty. These aspects might not be immediately apparent in the market early on, but they are essential for truly on-chain financial applications. Once the underlying rules become ambiguous, no matter how fast applications expand, risks will accumulate.

Another interesting aspect is the participant design. DUSK's assumptions align well with financial realities — in the future, there will be asset issuers, users, auditors, regulators, and other roles. This necessitates clear permission management and data boundaries at the foundational level, rather than relying on application layers to handle them.

In the long run, the value of financial infrastructure isn't determined by short-term activity but by whether it can maintain stability and maintainability over many years of continuous operation. DUSK's technical approach is designed around this goal — more like a system engineering project built with patience, not a trend-chasing public chain.

Understanding DUSK this way allows us to better see its development logic. It doesn't aim for broad coverage but strives for usability, controllability, and sustainability in specific scenarios — this is the core of its project positioning.